Laserfiche WebLink
PRO6LEm ASSESSMENT REPoFrr <br /> 44800 West Frontage Road Manteca California <br /> 5.1 6 Incineration <br /> Incineration of hydrocarbon-bearing soil at the site would require excavation of soil, <br /> permitting, and either contracting for a temporary soil incineration unit on site or hauling <br /> the soil to an off-site incinerator facility Typically, these units consist of a combustion <br /> chamber and a vapor-treatment system Soil is introduced into the chamber and heated <br /> sufficiently to volatilize and destroy the hydrocarbons present Fumes generated by the <br /> process may be collected and treated by various means Typically, on-site units treat <br /> approximately 500 cubic yards of sod per day to "non-detectable" levels If the soil is <br /> I treated on site it may be feasible to reclaim the material as backfill for the excavation(s) <br /> Currently, there are a limited number of units permitted in the western United States that <br /> incinerate soil <br /> 5.1.7 Physical Containment <br /> The physical containment of contaminants in soil is accomplished either by the injection <br /> of stabilizing agents into the soil matrix or by excavating soil and adding a stabilizing, <br /> vitrifying, or encapsulating agent The success of physical containment methods mainly <br /> depends on soil matrix grain size Soil with a coarse-grained matrix has a relatively high <br /> permeability and low attraction between sod particles, thus enhancing the ability of <br /> stabilizing agents to completely penetrate the soil Soil with a fine-grained matrix has a <br /> relatively low permeability and higher attraction between soil particles, thus inhibiting the <br /> introduction of stabilizing agents and reducing the effectiveness of the stabilizing process <br /> The presence of groundwater in close proximity to a containment area complicates <br /> placement of stabilizing agents and the ability of the agents to set up at or below the <br /> soil/water interface Because physical containment does not remove or degrade waste <br /> material, long-term monitoring may be required This alternative is feasible for a wide <br /> range of organic and inorganic compounds <br /> 5.2 Groundwater <br /> The following sections discuss groundwater remediation alternatives The technical <br /> approach to groundwater remediation generally falls into two broad categories, ex-situ <br /> and in-situ alternatives An option that is also considered is no action and/or monitoring <br /> only Ex-situ groundwater remediation alternatives involve the design, installation, <br /> operation, and maintenance of a suitable groundwater extraction and water treatment <br /> system In-situ options include passive approaches to groundwater remediation or <br /> injection of various media into the subsurface (soil and/or groundwater) to enhance <br /> biodegradation <br /> 90-097A PAR �7 <br />