Laserfiche WebLink
806 North Batavia - <br />FAX 714/538-1209 <br />April 4, 199 <br />San Joaquin <br />Environmenta <br />P.O. Box 388 <br />Stockton, CA <br />Attn: Mr. <br />Subject: <br />Dear Mr. Kith, <br />California 92668 - 714/771-6900 <br />unty <br />Health Division <br />95201-0388 <br />hael Kith <br />n Pacific Railroad Static Fish Bioassay G86552 <br />In accoance with our telephone conversation on April 3, <br />1995, the following should clarify the difference in the sample <br />description o the two Union Pacific Railroad fish bioassays. <br />On Marchl <br />Service ident <br />type of bioas <br />Positive Lab <br />% Survival Bi <br />on March 14, <br />Positive Lab <br />Railroad samp <br />request, the <br />1995. In rep <br />description " <br />J:iU.1y - 2S w i. u <br />refer to the <br />8, 1995, we received a sample from Positive Lab <br />fied as Union Pacific Railroad, Influent. As the <br />ay was not specified, I called John Schmidt at <br />ervice and he instructed me to perform a <br />assay. The analysis was completed and reported <br />995. On March 17, 1995, Jim Gorley called from <br />ervice and requested we rerun the Union Pacific <br />e at hazardous waste levels. Pursuant to their <br />ame sample was rerun and reported on March 22, <br />inting the bioassay report our office used the <br />astewater" in place of "Stormwater", however, both <br />c ys here p^-r_or-e' on the c -a rc P_J_ s <br />ttached Chain of Custody from Positive Lab Service. <br />Should Ztact <br />have any additional questions please do not <br />hesitate to me. <br />ASSOC TED Li <br />i <br />Rob rt A. We] <br />vice Presides <br />RAW/mjr <br />TESTING & CONSULTING <br />Chemical <br />Microbiological <br />Environmental <br />