COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FORM IC l page 2 of Sec. VI - Generator St tus EPA ID NO. A. 1991 RCRA generator status B. Reason for not generating Instruction page 7 Page 9 (CHECK ONE BOX BELOW) (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 1 LOG ❑ 1 Never generated ❑ 4 Only non -hazardous waste ❑ 2 SOG (SKIP TO SEC. VII) ❑ 2 Out of busyness ❑ 5 Periodic or occasional generator ❑ 3 CESOG ❑ 3 Only excluded or delisted ❑ 6 Waste minimization activity ❑ 4 Non generator (CONT( UE TO BOX B) waste ❑ 7 Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) Sec. VII - On -Site Waste anagernent Status A. RCRA permitted or interim status storage B. RCRA permitted or interim status C. RCRA-exempt treatment, disposal, or recycling Instruction page 10 treatment, disposal, or recycling Page 11 Page 10 U LZ �I Sec. VIII - Waste rtiiiiriiiirita la i. Acafvt during ig 1 � or 1991 A. Did this site begin or expand a 1ts2M= B. Did this site begin or expand a C. Did this site systematically investigate opportunities reduction activity during 1990 r 19917 racyrling activity during 1990 or 1991 for source reduction or regycl�no during 1990 or 19917 Instruction page 11 Page 12 Page 12 1 Yes El -1 Yes -M 1 Yes ❑ 2 No ❑ 2 No ❑ 2 No D. Did any of the factors listed bel pw delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional source reduction activities in 1990 or 19917 Page 12 (CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) Yn;L L ❑ 1 0 2 a. Insufficient opital to install new source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction practices El ® 2 b. Lack of tech 'til information on source reduction techniques applicable to the specific production processes ❑ 1 Gj 2 C. Source red ion is not economically feasible: cost savings In waste management or production will not recover the capital in estment Ell ® 2 d. Concern that roduct quality may decline as a result of source reduction ❑ 1 © 2 e. Technical limitations of the production processes ❑ 1 ❑ 2 f. Permitting ens El E3 2 g. Source redn previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be technically feasible ❑ 1 © 2 h. Source redn previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be economically feasible tin El ® 2 i. Source red previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be feasible due to permitting requirements El1 3 2 j. Other (SPECOMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) E. Did any of the factors listed below delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional on-site or off-site (ems activities during 1990 or 19917 Page 12 I (CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACI+f ITEM) YAL 1Q Yna t& C3 ❑, 2 a. Insufficient ital to Install new recycling equipment 01 ®' 2 h. Technical limitations of productlon processes inhibit or implement ow recycling practice on-site recycling ❑1 2 b. Lack of techn' Information on recycling techniques ❑1 .9 2 i. Permitting burdens inhibit recycling applicable to is site's specific production processes ❑1 S 2 j. Lack of permitted off-site recycling facilities Ell 3,2 C. Recycling is n economically feasible: cost savings in 01 ET 2 k. Unable to identify a market for recyclable materials waste manag ment or production will not recover the ❑l [R 2 I. Recycling previously implemented - additional capita km ent recycling does not appear to be technically feasible ❑1 132 d. Concern that roduct quality may decline as a result ❑1 ® 2 m. Recycling previously implemented - addWoral of recycling recycling does not appear to be soonorn"ly, feasible ❑l [Q 2 e. Requirements to manifest wastes inhibit shipments off 1:11 ® 2 n. Recycling previously Implemented - addhlonal alts for recycli recycling does not appear to be feasible due to Ell 132 f. Financial Nabi provisions inhibit shipments off site for permitting requirements recycling ❑1 2 o. Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) C31® 2 g. Technical Nm tions of production processes inhibit shipments off to for recycling Conwnertts: l page 2 of