Laserfiche WebLink
FORM IC <br />Sec. VI - Generator S atus EPA ID NO. <br />A. 1991 RCRA generator status <br />B. Reason for not generating <br />Instruction page 7 <br />Page 9 <br />(CHECK ONE BOX BELOW) <br />(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) <br />25 1 LOG —i <br />❑ 1 Never generated <br />❑ 4 Only non -hazardous waste <br />❑ 2 SOG (SKIF <br />TO SEC. VII) <br />❑ 2 Out of business <br />❑ 5 Periodic or occasional generator <br />❑ 3 CESOG —J <br />❑ 3 Only excluded or delisted <br />❑ 6 Waste minimization activity <br />❑ 4 Non generator (CONTINUE TO BOX B) <br />waste <br />❑ 7 Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) <br />Sec. VII - On -Site Waste <br />Management Status <br />A. RCRA permitted or Interim status <br />storage <br />B. RCRA permitted or interim status <br />C. RCRA-exempt treatment, disposal, or recycling <br />Instruction page 10 <br />treatment, disposal, or recycling <br />Page 11 <br />Page 10 <br />_ .x ... ,. , .. ... <br />1 <br />LZJ <br />Sec. VIII - Waste Minimization Activity during 1990 or 1991 <br />A. Did this site begin or expand <br />a ilZUM <br />B. Did this site begin or expand a <br />C. Did this site systematically investigate Opportunities <br />reduction activity during 1990 <br />or 19917 <br />ta=iing activity during 1990 or 19917 <br />for source reduction or reZmlina during 1990 or 19917 <br />Instruction page 11 <br />Page 12 <br />Page 12 <br />1 Yes <br />1 Yes <br />1 Yes <br />❑ 2 No <br />❑ 2 No <br />❑ 2 No <br />D. Did any of the factors listed <br />delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional source reduction activities in 1990 or 19917 <br />Page 12 <br />(CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) <br />AL <br />01 fd 2 a. Insufflde <br />t capital to Install new source reduction equipment or implement <br />new source reduction practices <br />1:11 :0 2 b. Lack oft <br />nical Information on source reduction techniques applicable to the specific production processes <br />01 'ET 2 a. Source remiuction <br />is not economically feasible: cost savings In waste <br />management or prod uctlon will not recover <br />r� ft <br />01 ty 2 d. Concern tiat <br />Investment <br />product quality may decline as a result of source reduction _._.._ _. _...�... <br />all <br />Eli {r��. 2 e. Technical <br />limitations of the production processes <br />❑1 i9 2 f. Perm" <br />burdens <br />01 .r�a�2 g. Souroe <br />uction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be technically feasible <br />01 zr 2 h. Source <br />uction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be economically feasible <br />❑1 2 I. Source <br />uctlon previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be feasible due to perrnink)g requirements <br />Eli 2 J. Other (S <br />OFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELO': <br />E. Did any of the factors listed <br />low delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional on-site or off -site [CGiips activities during 1990 or 19917 <br />Page 12 <br />(CHEGtK YES OR NO FOR <br />CH ITEM) <br />YJei. �.,w.o.w-an <br />....:.. ., ... ,...r � Na <br />...:,..,,-: �.,.ecc::�.+x.+.�.�.nr�a:•.ncw.�+,.. . <br />..ter......... _.-. <br />-production <br />❑1 2 a. 4tiufflde <br />to Install'new recycling equipment ❑1 2 <br />h. Technical limitatloni of proceseeti Inhibit <br />or Imple <br />nt new recycling practice <br />on -este recycling P 4,)lV e,e "01 ' <br />❑1 2 b. Lack of <br />nlcal information on recycling techniques ❑1 Q'2 <br />I. Permitting burdens Inhibit recyc�uasiv,t-�u <br />to this af's specific production processes ❑1 52 <br />1. Lads of permitted off-site recydlnp.twilMea.. _ .... <br />-appl <br />❑1 � 2 C. Recycll <br />Ii not economically feasible: coat savings in ❑1 -M72 <br />k. Unable to identify a market for recyclable materials <br />waste m <br />gement or production will not recover the 01 �2 <br />I. Recycling previously implemented - addftkxW <br />01 2 A. Concem <br />ent �,{ <br />at may decline as a result ❑1 <br />recycling does not appear to be technically feasible <br />taddlUonal- <br />- <br />product quality tv 2 <br />m. Recycling previously Implemenlsld.- . <br />Of recydi <br />recycling does not appear to be economically feasible <br />01 2 e. Require <br />nts to manifest wastes Inhibit shipments off ❑ 1 E$ 2 <br />n. Recycling previously Unplemented- additional <br />site for <br />Ing <br />recycling does not appear to be feasible due to <br />Eli ,E� 2 f. Financial <br />lability provisions Inhibit shipments off she for <br />permitting requirements '''x 'c"e to t, <br />filing <br />❑1 2 <br />o, Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BbX BELOW)' <br />01 'N 2 g. T <br />Mmitations of production processes inhibit <br />- <br />shipment <br />off site for recycling <br />` w <br />Page 2 of <br />