My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
92-2764
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARLAN
>
17100
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
92-2764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 10:04:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2017 2:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
RECORD_ID
92-2764
STREET_NUMBER
17100
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HARLAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
SITE_LOCATION
17100 S HARLAN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
08/04/1992
P_LOCATION
E R CARPENTER
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HARLAN\17100\92-2764.PDF
QuestysFileName
92-2764
QuestysRecordID
1743290
QuestysRecordType
12
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'----------ER CARPENTE .----------------------------------------�. - X002 <br /> 07/20/92 08:35 $209 9G81733 7-7 <br /> a <br /> City ' of Latham <br /> rS`i L. ` � '�r <br /> 16775, MZMr4d Road-su$te One h <br /> L2 <br /> . , Cal OY7LZfZ 95334 •� � x__ - <br /> (209) e58-2860 - <br /> Pax (208) $Sa-52.59 <br /> dune 4, 1992 ` <br /> R. Carpenter• Company, Inc. J U 0 5 1992 <br /> Ted Brown <br /> P. Q. Box 279 <br /> Lathrop, CA 95330 <br /> Dear Ted: <br /> 4, <br /> You requested that I send you. this letter conn <br /> wells, drilled in the City of Lathrop. ex-Izing the depth of r <br /> Qre than a year ago, the City Council adopted the <br /> new wells were to be po�.iay that no <br /> The reason for allowed to be drilled irl the city of Lathrop- <br /> of tha t�s waS that the mound water table and the quality <br /> gzotznc� watex were being effected, by salt grater intrus4 on in <br /> the western hall of the city. <br /> As T told r :•. <br /> allowed t you in our conversation sometime ago that you would �� 1 <br /> a redo yeizr well because it was existing and that it j <br /> shc�-d�not exceed the're <br /> aune z, 1992, Y intorme youethat the City Again in <br /> n allow our gation of f <br /> to be drilled, deepQr than x.25 meet (preferab�,y' 11.5) feet) in a f :• t <br /> asxy �e�.1s <br /> situation such as yours Where 'thy: well xs fr�r _at) <br /> only and - <br /> you are redoing 'the existing well. City <br /> This is the only reason 0' <br /> well was allowed to be drilled' within theY { <br /> - , <br /> believes *that it is clear fox[t this e <br /> xp <br /> should not exceed 125 feet. lanation that yaux well <br /> r <br /> Should <br /> you hale ally further questions on th <br /> me .at 8585592. is matter pItease contact <br /> Cordially, <br /> Director <br /> cox smitGal memo 7675s <br /> post-it"brand taac �' <br /> Co <br /> Dep Phon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.