Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> l'ou'" <br /> o SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> � Unit Supervisors <br /> Donna K Heran,R E H S <br /> 304 East Weber A�,enue, Third Floor Carl Borgmaa,R E H s <br /> 1 f Direcloi Mike Huggins,R E H S , R D l <br /> Al Olsen,R E H S Stockton, California 95202-2708 Douglas W Wilson, R E H S <br /> • CQc'FO���P • Ptogiam Afanagei Telephone (209) 468-3420 Margaret Lagor:o,R E H S <br /> Laurie A Cotulla,R E H S Fax (209) 464-0138 Robert McClelion,R E H S <br /> Pr ogi ani Manager %lark Barcellos,R E H S <br /> MICHAEL KARVELOT 4AUG 2 3 MA <br /> QUIK STOP MARKETS INC <br /> 4567 ENTERPRISE STREET <br /> FREMONT CA 94538 <br /> RE Quik Stop Station No 76 SITE CODE 887 <br /> 1030 South Olive Avenue RO 887 <br /> Stockton, CA 95215 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) personal was present for <br /> installation of monitoring well MW-1 on July 3, 2003 While grouting the borehole, the <br /> casing cap popped off and grout entered the v,ell casing of MW-1 Now, after four <br /> groundwater-monitoring events, it appears that the integrity of MW-1 was compromised <br /> during the well installation This is based on the following information <br /> • 0 During the July 11, 2003, monitoring event pH readings were quite high, ranging <br /> from 11 97 to 12 26, and dunng the June 10, 2004, monitoring event the pH <br /> readings ranged from 11 61 to 11 77 These high pH readings are an indication <br /> that cement in the well is affecting the water chemistry <br /> * During the sampling event on June 10, 2004, the field technician was able to <br /> purge approximately one gallon of groundwater from MW-I when approximately <br /> three gallons should have been purged The field technician also noted that the <br /> groundwater smelled like concrete <br /> During the groundwater-sampling event on August 20, 2004, the EnviroTech 24- <br /> olt four-stage pump was only able to purge approximately 0 5 gallons of water <br /> from the well The field technician noted that there might be an obstruction that <br /> prevented the pump and disposable bailer from reaching the well bottom Also, <br /> the well took approximately an hour to recharge to eighty percent and only one <br /> reading was taken for pH and conductivity The temperature reading was not <br /> reported because the field technician felt the high reading was inaccurate <br /> Therefore, the monitonng well at this site must be properly destroyed and replaced <br /> Submit a work plan to destroy the well, an EHD permit application, and $60 permit fee to <br /> EHD by September 30, 2004 Please note that monitoring wells in areas of <br /> contamination may only be destroyed by removing all of the well contents by drilling out <br /> the original borehole and filling the borehole with grout The monitoring,vA ell must be <br /> �. replaced with a new well that meets current well construction standards <br />