My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 2:44:24 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canepa's Car Wash -3- March 16, 2010 <br /> Claim No. 1695 <br /> VI. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION <br /> A. Soil Excavation: unknown volume <br /> B. In-Situ Soil/ Groundwater Remediation: <br /> • METHOD: dual phase extraction <br /> • DURATION: pending <br /> C. Groundwater Trends: <br /> • Benzene trends are shown below <br /> BENZENE Results for MW-5 <br /> 16000- <br /> 14000 <br /> s000 14000 <br /> 12000 <br /> 10000 <br /> 8000 <br /> 6000 <br /> 4000 <br /> 2000 - <br /> � I , <br /> W� BENZENE — - Trend <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: two wells identified within 1/2 mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description- former retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is undefined east of site, <br /> 10 wells proposed to define extent. <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: none identified, high vacuum soil vapor extraction <br /> remediation plan is being prepared. <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F. Recommendation: <br /> In February 2008, the Fund made the following recommendation: This case has <br /> been open since 1990 and no remediation has been performed. The Fund <br /> recommends the Responsible Party assess remedial technologies and <br /> implement active remediation without delay. In addition, it should be noted that <br /> existing well screens are positioned 20 feet below the water table and the <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> �.*Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.