My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009561
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009561
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:20:12 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:31:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009561
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U <br /> Canepa's Car Wash <br /> 248 East Park Street,Stockton,California <br /> Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report,April 2006 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> •� Table 1 —Groundwater Elevation Data (April 28, 2006) <br /> Well Casing <br /> Monitoring Well TOC Elevation' Screen Interval Depth to Groundwater Groundwater <br /> (feet) Elevation(feet) <br /> (feet-b s) <br /> MW-1 1278 45 - 65 2341 -1063 <br /> MW-2 12 18 45 - 65 2438 1 -1220 <br /> MW-3 1357 45 - 65 2492 -1135 <br /> MW-4 1266 40 - 60 2295 -1029 <br /> MW-5 1306 40 -60 2467 -1161 <br /> MW-6 13 53 40 - 60 2485 -1132 <br /> MW-7 1286 40 -60 2383 -1097 <br /> ' TOC Elevation Elevations are measured from a mark on the top of the well casmg and are referenced to NGS benchmark HS0391 using NAVD 88 <br /> datum <br /> bgs=below ground surface <br /> All wells were surveyed on October 5,2001 All measurernents are in feet <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed by Argon Laboratories of Ceres, California, for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA Method 8015M, and for benzene, toluene, ethyl <br /> benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) and selected gasoline oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260B <br /> The selected gasoline oxygenates/additives included MTBE, tertiary-butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether <br /> (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2- <br /> DCA),and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) <br /> iMTBE was detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitor well MW-6 at a concentration of <br /> 14 micrograms per liter (µg/L) MTBE was not detected at or above the elevated detection limits of 10 <br /> µg/L and 50 }tg/L in the groundwater samples collected from monitor wells MW-2 and MW-5, <br /> respectively, nor at or above the detection limit of 0 5 gg/L in the groundwater samples collected from <br /> monitor wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-7 Low concentrations of MTBE have historically been <br /> detected sporadically in groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, <br /> MW-6, and MW-7 MTBE has historically not been detected at or above raised laboratory reported <br /> detection limits in MW-2 and MW-5, with the exception of questionable laboratory analytical results in <br /> July 1997 for MW-2 and in April 1997 for MW-5 <br /> The detected concentration of benzene in monitoring well MW-2 has generally had an inverse <br /> relationship with groundwater elevation(Figure 6, Attachment A) In contrast, benzene concentrations in <br /> MW-5 have generally increased as the groundwater elevation has increased (Figure 7, Attachment A) <br /> Also during the current monitoring event, 1,2-DCA was detected in the groundwater sample collected <br /> from MW-5 at a concentration of 70 µg/L Historic groundwater analytical data are presented in Table A, <br /> Attachment B Analytical results for the current groundwater monitoring event are generally consistent <br /> with historic results, groundwater samples from MW-2 and MW-5 continue to exhibit a modest decline in <br /> analyte constituent concentrations comparable to pre-October 2001 levels <br /> A summary of the laboratory analytical results for the current monitoring event is presented in Table 2, on <br /> the next page Laboratory report sheets indicating analytical methods used, reporting limits, and the <br /> results of the analyses are included in Attachment D <br /> • <br /> �� CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.