Laserfiche WebLink
�l 3i <br /> Canepa s Car Wash <br /> 248 East Park Street,Stockton,Califomia <br /> Fourth Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report,November 2003 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> • Table I —Groundwater Elevation Data (November 2003) <br /> Monitoring Well TOC Elevation Well Casing Depth to Groundwater Groundwater <br /> Screen Interval (feet) Elevation(feet-amsl) <br /> (feet-b s) <br /> MW-1 1278 45 -65 2763 -1485 <br /> MW-2 1218 45 -65 2850 -1632 <br /> MW-3 13 57 45 - 65 2899 -1542 <br /> MW-4 1266 40 - 60 2722 -1456 <br /> MW-5 1306 40 -60 2869 -1563 <br /> MW-6 13 53 40 - 60 2889 -15 36 <br /> MW-7 1286 40 -60 2799 -15 13 <br /> `TOC Elevation Elevations are measured from a mark on the top of the well casing and are referenced to NGS benchmark HS0391 using NAVD 88 <br /> datum <br /> bgs=below ground surface <br /> artist=above mean sea Ievel <br /> All wells were surveyed on October 5,2001 All measurements are in feet <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed by Excelchem Environmental Laboratories, Inc for total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA Method 8015m, for benzene, toluene, <br /> ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020, and for methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) by EPA Method 8020 The EPA Method 8020 analyses indicated that MTBE was detected in the <br /> groundwater sample collected from MW-2 at a concentration of 1,100 pg/L, MW-3 at a concentration of <br /> 9 4 pg/L, and that MTBE was not detected at or above an elevated detection limit of 1,000 µg/L in the <br /> groundwater sample collected from MW-5 Because the result for the MW-2 sample was inconsistent <br /> with historical results and the detection limit for the MW-5 sample was elevated, the samples were re- <br /> analyzed for MTBE by EPA Method 8260B The results of the EPA Method 8260B analyses indicated <br /> that MTBE was not detected in the samples from MW-2 and MW-5 at or above the laboratory reported <br /> detection limits of 0 5 pg/L for MW-2, and 5 0 pg/L for MW-5 <br /> Historical groundwater analytical data are presented in Table A, Attachment B A summary of the <br /> laboratory analytical results for the current monitoring event is presented in Table 2, on the next page <br /> Laboratory report sheets indicating analytical methods used, reporting limits, and the results of the <br /> analyses are included in Attachment D <br /> The concentration of benzene in monitor well MW-2 has generally had an inverse relationship with <br /> groundwater elevation (Figure 6, Attachment A) In contrast, benzene concentrations in MW-5 have <br /> generally increased as the groundwater elevation has increased(Figure 7, Attachment A) <br /> Concentrations of MTBE in monitor well MW-6 have ranged from < 0 5 to 23 pg/L historically and <br /> MTBE was not detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limit of 5 0 pg/L dun-ng the July, <br /> 2003, monitoring event, and the current monitoring event This reflects a downward trend from a peak of <br /> 21 pg/L in April 2002 Low concentrations of MTBE have been detected sporadically in groundwater <br /> samples collected from monitor wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-7 MTBE has historically not been <br /> detected at or above laboratory reported detection limits in MW-2 and MW-5, with the exception of a <br /> questionable laboratory analytical result in April 1997 for MW-2 <br /> CONDOR <br />