My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009602
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:20:06 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:42:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009602
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> iQUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br />. FIRST QUARTER-JANUARY 1999 <br /> i <br /> Canepa's Car Wash <br />' 248 E. Park Street <br /> Stockton, California <br />' February 8,1999 <br /> i1 INTRODUCTION <br /> Condor Earth Technologies, Inc (Condor) conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring on January 20, 1999, at <br /> the Canepa's Car Wash facility located at 248 E Park Street in Stockton, California (Figure 1, Appendix A) <br /> iThe groundwater monitoring was conducted at the request of Mr Remo Canepa, facility owner, in response to <br /> directlon from Mr Ronald Rowe of the San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health <br /> Division (PHS/EHD) The work conducted during the quarterly groundwater monitoring was performed in <br /> i general accordance with approved protocol formerly established for the site The scope-of-work performed <br /> was approved by Mr Ronald Rowe of the PHS/EHD This report includes a site background, a description of <br /> the field and laboratory analyses performed for the January 1999, quarterly monitoring event, discussion of <br /> iresults, and recommendations <br /> 2 SITE BACKGROUND <br /> The site is located in the downtown business district of Stockton, California One 12,000-gallon unleaded <br /> gasoline underground storage tank (UST), one 5,000-gallon leaded gasoline UST, and one 5,000-gallon diesel <br /> i fuel UST were removed from the site in 1990 According to WI-IF Environmental Consultants, Inc (WHF), the <br /> soil samples collected from the UST excavation were collected from approximately 16 feet below the ground <br /> surface (bgs) and contained elevated concentrations of gasoline and gasoline constituents Between September, <br /> i 1993, and March, 1994, WHF installed six soil borings and seven monitor wells in and around the site Three <br /> of the monitor wells (MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3) were constructed with a screened interval from 45 to 65 feet <br /> bgs MW-4 through MW-7 were constructed with a screen interval from 40 to 60 feet bgs <br /> iBeginning in April, 1997, Condor implemented a quarterly groundwater monitoring program at the site <br /> Following the July, 1998 quarterly groundwater monitoring event, Mr Rowe of the PHS/EHD ordered the <br /> i installation of additional monitor wells The previously installed monitor wells (MW-1 through MW-7) are <br /> screened below the present groundwater table Water level measurements made at the site on October 21, <br /> 1998, indicated that the groundwater table was between 23 5 and 25 3 feet bgs A Work Plan has been prepared <br /> i for the installation of four additional monitor wells (MW-8 through MW-12) and is currently pending approval <br /> by the PHS/EHD <br /> i 3. QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING—JANUARY 1999 <br /> On January 20, 1999, a Condor representative made field observations and collected groundwater samples from <br /> the seven monitor wells at the site (see figure 2, Appendix A, for well locations) The sampling order was as <br /> itollo,.Ns MW-4, MW-3, MW-6, MW-5, M..'-2, MW-7, and MW-1 <br /> i �� CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.