Laserfiche WebLink
.11,June 2002 -� <br /> AGE-NC'Project No. 96-0229 <br /> Page 5`6f 5 _ <br /> G' A Feasibility-Studies'and Monitoring Well installation Work Plan was-submitted to the EHD'on 15-: <br /> February 2002 and approved:bythe EHD'by letter on 15 March 2002; the:scope'of work include'd' } <br /> { <br /> installation.of one groundwater extraction well, three soil vapor extraction (SVE)'wells, one'in-situ =_ <br /> - <br /> air s ar in well IAS and two ` - <br /> p $ g a (JAS) ground water monitoring wells; performance of a 24-hour:ground , <br /> water aquifer pumpirig test, performance of an eight-hour SVE pilot test, performance of a 48-hour,. n <br /> IAS pilot test and'performance of a.247hour SVE/IAS pilot test. Upon pre-approval-by the UST;" <br /> Cleanup Fund AGE will-schedule field work-w' 'A the EHD..Upon completion of feasibility testing, <br /> AGE will prepare a problem assessment report ,(PAR}, the PARshould Include results of-any . , <br /> feasibility,studies to determine appropriate remediation alternatives for the site: : r ' <br /> _ 6.0. LIMITATIONS w <br />_ . '.Our professional services were performed using that degree'of care and.skill ordinarily exercised by. ' <br /> environmental consultants'practicing in this or similar localities:'-The findings were based mainly' <br /> upon analytical results provided by.an independent laboratory. Evaluations of the 'hydrogeologic- <br /> coriditions at the site'for theose of this investi ation are'made from'a limited number of available-'� "Y» <br /> Pte. g .� <br /> data points (e.g, ground water,samples), and subsurface-conditions may vary away from these data '` - <br /> Y points." No other:warranty,_expressed or implied,:is made as to the professional interpretations, <br /> } `# <br /> C opinions-and recommendations contained in this report. <br /> .Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />