Laserfiche WebLink
03 January 2002 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 96-0229 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> towards the northeast at an approximate gradient of 0 01 ft/ft or less <br /> • Due to the low hydraulic gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water measurements <br /> or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly modify the inferred <br /> Iground water flow direction <br /> • Monitoring wells MW-I and MW-1 OB are "drowned", and yield samples representative of <br /> deeper ground water conditions Deeper ground water in the area of MW-1 (48 to 53 feet <br /> bsg) is impacted by TPH-g, BTEX, MTBE and DIPE, deeper ground water in the area of <br /> downgradient well MW-1OB is impacted by MTBE <br /> • MTBE was detected in the sample collected from well MW-1 (screened 48 to 53 feet bsg) <br /> in deeper ground water, but was not detected in the samples collected from shallow water <br /> I on-site wells MW-2 (located 5 feet from MW-1) and MW-4, implying that an undelineated <br /> MTBE and possibly DIPE-impact may be present crossgradient to downgradient of the site <br /> at deeper depths (Figure 5) <br />' The greatest concentrations of off-site dissolved MTBE were detected In downgradient wells <br /> MW-6 and MW-7, low concentrations of dissolved MTBE were detected at wells MW-8, <br />� . MW-9, MW-10A and MW-10B, a trend of increasing off-site MTBE concentrations has <br /> been noted since March 2001 <br /> Increasing TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE were reported in water samples collected from wells <br /> MW-1, MW-2 MW-3, MW-9 and MW-IOA, increasing TPH-g was reported from MW-7 <br /> and increasing MTBE was reported from MW-6 and MW-10B, suggesting that the plume <br /> of MTBE-Impacted ground water has shifted towards the northeast <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2,MW-3, MW-6 and MW-7 indicate that these wells are within or near <br /> the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon"core area"of the plume (Figure 4) <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data collected dunng September 2001, AGE recommends <br /> • Preparation of a feasibility study work plan to assess remedial alternatives for feasibility and <br /> cost to address the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume at the site <br /> • Preparation of a corrective action plan (CAP), the CAP should include results of any <br /> feasibility studies to determine appropriate remediation alternatives for the site <br /> • • Performance of a receptor survey to locate potential receptors within 2,000 feet of the site, <br /> results of the receptor survey should be Included in the CAP <br />' Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br /> I <br />