Laserfiche WebLink
18 February 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0229 <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br /> 2002) Subsequently, the RWQCB disagreed with AGE's recommendation, stating 0-at In-situ Air <br /> Spargmg (IAS) combined with soil vapor extraction (SVE) would be a better alternative At the <br /> request of the END, by letter dated 30 January 2003, AGE is currently comparing IAS/SVE and <br /> ground water extraction as interim remediation techniques, utilizing site-specific data to select the <br /> most appropriate of the two methods AGE will subsequently submit a work plan proposing the <br /> method that was judged to be the most appropriate <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based mainly <br /> upon analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the <br /> geologic/hydrogeologic conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a <br /> limited number of available data points (e g soil and ground water samples), and subsurface <br /> conditions may vary away from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made <br /> as to the professional interpretations, opinions and recommendations contained in this report <br /> Advanced GeoEnvi ron mental,Inc <br />