Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Monitoring Report April 2001 <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> gasoline (TPH-G), and methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) are present to the vicintty of the former location <br /> Iof the fuel dispenser islands <br /> Pilo[ to granting approval of installation of the new SVE system, the Underground Storage Tank Glean-Up <br /> I Fund indicated the need for additional investigation Condor subsequently conducted the installation and <br /> sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array The investigation included soil vapor screening <br /> using a Simulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection mode The results indicated high <br /> concentrations of volatile organic compounds were present in the soil vapor at the site The laboratory <br /> analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation are presented in <br /> Report — Sial and Groundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998 Operation of the SVE system <br /> continued since its initiation on March 15, 1999 until it was shut down on January 24, 2001 pending <br /> further evaluation, because of efficiency less than required by the operating permit <br /> I Due to a directive from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF), laboratory analyses of <br /> groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260 were discontinued <br /> beginning with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event The USTCF indicated that <br /> analysis by EPA Method 8260 is not warranted based on historical groundwater laboratory analytical <br /> Eresults Commencing with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event, laboratory analyses <br /> of groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives are limited to MTBE using EPA Method 8020 <br /> or 8021 B <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING —APRIL 20011 <br /> I • On April 10 and 11 2001 a Condor representative collected groundwater samples from the eight monitor <br /> wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A, for well locations) The sampling order was as follows MW- <br /> 1, MW-3, MW-2, MW-7, MW-5, MW-4, MW-6, and MW-8 <br /> 3.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well <br /> to check toi floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen No floating product or sheen was observed in <br /> any of the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling The surface of the groundwater table was <br /> above the top of the well screens, however The following olfactory observations were made <br /> + A strong petroleum hydrocat bon odor was detected in the groundwater safnples collected from MW- <br /> 2 <br /> • A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor was detected In the groundwater sample collected from <br /> MW-4 <br /> + Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in any of the other groundwater samples <br /> All of the monitor wells were purged with a Grundfos Redi-Flo 11 submersible pump, which was <br /> decontaminated prior to use Appioximately three well casing volumes of water were purged from each <br /> well (see the Groundwater Monitoring P geld 1 orms in Appendix 13) rhe purged water from each weli <br /> was discharged to the wastewater mixing pit <br /> 3 2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> . The groundwater samples were collected by filling three 40-milliliter glass vials with groundwater <br /> directly fioin the pump discharge tubing at a reduced rate The sample containers were labeled, placed in <br /> CONDOR <br />