Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Quarterly Monitoring Report April 2001 <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pac.itic Avenue) <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> 1 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS (APRIL 11, 2001) <br />' B T E X MTBE TPH-G <br /> Repoi ting limits 03 01 03 06 1 0 005 <br /> Monitoi Well I D p L nig/L l_rg/L �tg/L }L-/L mg/L <br /> 1707-MW1-4/11/01 340 130 34 110 170 17 <br /> 1707-MW2-4/11101 31,000 1,700 2,200 6,300 ND(200) 100 <br />' 1707-MW3-4/11/01 ND ND ND ND 83 ND <br /> 1707-MW4-4111/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br />' 1707-MW5-411 1/01 01 ND ND ND ND ND <br /> 1707-MW6-4/11/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br />' 1707-MW7-4/1 1/01 26 ND ND 0 8 ND ND <br /> 1707-MW8-4111/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> Unit Conversions Analytical <br /> pg/L parts per billion(ppb) B T E,X=benzene toluene ethyl benzene,and total xylenes <br /> mg/L parts per million(ppm) TPH-G=total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline <br /> MTBE=Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether <br /> ND=not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit <br /> 4 3 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM <br /> Operation of the SVE system was Initiated on March 15, 1999 Condor monitors the system on a monthly <br /> basis Volatile organic vapor screening is performed with a photo-ionization detector (PID) at the system <br /> inlet and exhaust to evaluate the destfuction efficiency of the thermal oxidation unit Vacuum <br /> measurements in inches of water are recorded from ports installed at the SVE wells to evalitate the radius <br /> of influence Various other system parameters aie monitored to maintain optimum performance of the <br />' SVE system (see SVE System Log, Appendix D) <br /> The hydiocarbon destruction efficiency for the year 2000 ranged from 96 66% to 100% The average <br />' hydrocafbon destiuction rate fof 2000 was 98 8% The system was turned off from January 18, 2001 <br /> until January 24, 2001 for repairs The efficiency rate upon restarting the system was 69% The system <br /> was restarted for efficiency monitoring on January 25 and February 6, 2001 Destruction efficiency was <br /> 80 3% and 79 6% on those respective days Because of the low efficiency upon restarting the system, <br /> additional monitoi ing of and adjustments to the system were conducted in an attempt to achieve proper <br /> efficiency Because 95% efficiency could not be achieved the system was removed from service pending <br /> farther evnhintion <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> 5 1 DISCUSSION OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS <br /> The average depth to groundwater measured during the April 2001 groundwater-monitoring event was <br /> approximately 32 1 feet below the monitor well measuring points, which is approximately 14 to 18 feet <br />' above the top of all monitoring well screens The groundwater elevation ranged from 18 55 to 19 61 feet <br />' �� CONDOR <br />