Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Quarterly Monitoring Report,January 2000 <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> February 28,2000 <br /> Page -2 <br /> of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as <br /> gasoline (TPH-G), and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) were present in the former location of the fuel <br /> dispenser islands <br /> Prior to granting approval of installation of the new SVE system, the Underground Storage Tank Clean-Up <br /> I Fund indicated the need for additional investigation Condor subsequently conducted the installation and <br /> sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array The investigation included soil vapor <br /> screening using a Snmulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection mode The results indicated high <br /> levels of volatile orgame compounds were present in the soil vapor at the site The laboratory analytical <br /> results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation are presented in Report—Soil <br /> and Groundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998 Operation of the SVE system has continued since <br /> its initiation on March 15, 1999 <br /> Due to a directive from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF), laboratory analyses of <br /> groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/addttnves by EPA Method. 8260 was discontinued <br /> beginning with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event The USTCF indicated that <br /> analysis by EPA Method 8260 is not warranted based on historical groundwater laboratory analytical <br /> results Commencing with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event, laboratory <br /> analyses of groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives is limited to MTBE using EPA <br /> Method 602 A detailed Site History is included to Appendix B <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING--JANUARY 2000 <br /> On January 13, 14, and 15, 2000 a Condor representative performed field observations and collected <br /> I groundwater samples from the eight monitor wells and one soil vapor extraction well at the site (see <br /> Figure 2, Appendix A, for well locations) The sampling order was as follows MW-3, MW-5, MW-4, <br /> MW-8,MW-6, MW-7,MW-2,MW-1, and SV-1 <br /> 3.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> I tape, water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well <br /> to check for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of <br /> the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling The surface of the groundwater table was above the <br /> top of the well screens, however A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in each of the <br /> groundwater sample collected from MW-2 and SV-1 A slight petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in <br /> each of the groundwater sample collected from MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, and MW-1 Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the remaining groundwater samples <br /> All of the monitor wells except MW-I were purged using new, disposable bailers Monitor well MW-1 <br /> was purged with a Redn-Flow submersible pump that was decontaminated prior to use Approximately <br /> three well casing volumes of water were purged from each well (see the Groundwater Monitoring Field <br /> Forms in Appendix B) The purged water from each well was discharged to the washwater mixing pit <br /> 3.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> The groundwater samples obtained from monitor wells MW-2 through MW-8, and SV-I were collected <br /> 1 directly from the bailers by transferring the groundwater to two 40-milliliter glass vials <br /> LJ CONDOR <br />