Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Monitoring Report October 1999 <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> November 22 1999 <br /> Page -2 <br /> iPrior to granting approval of installation of the new SVE system, the Underground Storage Tank Clean-Up <br /> Fund indicated the need for additional investigation Condor subsequently conducted the installation and <br /> sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array The investigation included soil vapor <br /> screening using a Simulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection anode The results indicated high <br /> levels of volatile organic compounds were present in the soil vapor at the site The laboratory analytical <br /> results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation are presented in Report—Soil <br /> and Groundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998 Operation of the SVE system has continued since <br /> its initiation on March 15, 1999 <br /> Due to a directive from the Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund (USTCF), laboratory analyses of <br /> groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives by EPA Method <br /> beginning with the O uarterly groundwater monitoring event The USTCF indicated that <br /> analysis by EPA Method 8260 is not warranted based on historical groundwater laboratory analytical <br /> results Commencing with the October 1999 quarterly groundwater monitoring event, laboratory analyses <br /> of groundwater samples for gasoline oxygenates/additives is limited to MTBE using EPA Method 602 <br /> A detailed Site History is included in Appendix B <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING- OCTOBER 1999 <br /> On October 13 and 14, 1999, a Condor representative performed field observations and collected <br /> groundwater samples from the eight monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A, for well <br /> locations) The sampling order was as follows MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8, MW-7, MW-1, SV-3, <br /> MW-2, and MW-3 <br /> 3.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well <br /> to check for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of <br /> the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling The surface of the groundwater table was above the <br /> top of the well screens, however A strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater <br /> samples collected from MW-1 and MW-2 A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the <br /> groundwater sample collected from SV-3 Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the remaining <br /> groundwater samples <br /> All of the monitor wells except MW-1 and soil vapor extraction well SV-3 were purged using new, <br /> disposable bailers Monitor well MW-1 and SV-3 were purged with a Redi-Flow submersible pump that <br /> was decontaminated prior to use Approximately three well casing volumes of water were purged from <br /> each well (see the Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms i*i Appendix B) The purged water from each <br /> well was placed in a plastic, 55-gallon drum and left on site pending analytical results <br /> 3.2 GROUNDW ATER SAMPLING <br /> The groundwater samples obtained from monitor wells MW-2 through MW-8 were collected directly <br /> from the bailers by transferring the groundwater to two 40-milliliter glass vials The groundwater <br /> samples obtained from MW-1 and SV-3 were collected by filling two 40-milliliter glass vials ftk <br /> 1 <br /> �J CONDOR <br />