My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006690
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:26:48 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:32:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006690
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> • <br /> Condor Earth Technologies, Inc. (Condor) prepared this combination Problem Assessment Report(PAR)/ <br /> Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to summarize the investigation of the release of petroleum hydrocarbons to <br /> soil and groundwater, and to evaluate remedial alternatives for mitigation, at Canepa's Car Wash, 6230 <br /> Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California. The business consists of an automated car washing facility, a fuel <br /> station, and a convenience store. <br /> In 1993, three underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed. Soil samples indicated subsurface <br /> contamination, and four monitoring wells were installed. Nine SVE wells were installed and a thermal <br /> oxidation unit was installed at the site for vapor extraction and treatment from March 1994 through June <br /> 1995, and with modifications again from 1999 to the present. Since 1993 multiple investigations have <br /> essentially defined the lateral and vertical extent of subsurface contamination. Quarterly monitoring of the <br /> groundwater monitoring wells is continuing. <br /> In general, organic clay is present from the surface to about eight feet. Beneath the clay to a depth of <br /> about 50 to 60 feet are silt deposits with interbedded and discontinuous lenses of clayey to silty sand. <br /> Below approximately 60 feet, sands are more abundant. <br /> Groundwater beneath the site is unconfined and the depth to the water table in June of 2002 was about 35 <br /> feet. The overall trend in groundwater table elevation is downward from 1950 to at least the mid sixties. <br /> From 1994 to the second quarter of 2000, the trend was upward with a rise of about 20 feet at the site. <br /> Since second quarter 2000, the elevation has been relatively flat with a seasonal range of about 2 feet. <br /> • Soil contamination resulting from the release was detected in samples collected from depths ranging from <br /> about 26 feet to 70 feet. Presumably as a result of the soil vapor extraction system, a recent investigation <br /> indicate virtually no soil contamination exists above groundwater table. The groundwater plume is <br /> generally confined to the site. Conservatively, the plume contains an estimated 372,000 cubic feet of <br /> groundwater and 6.7 gallons of benzene. <br /> The Risk Based Corrective Action Evaluation was conducted using benzene as the constituent of greatest <br />' concern. The Average Inhalation Exposure Concentration (vapor intrusion into on-site buildings) was <br /> calculated to be 0.024 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/rn). This is in comparison to the Occupational <br /> Safety and Health Administration limit of 3.25 mg/m3, or the National Institute for Occupational Safety <br /> and Health recommended limit of 0.325 mg/m3. However, this also would produce an individual cancer <br /> risk of 2.0 in 10,000, greater than the target level of one in one million. <br />' Evaluation of the remedial alternatives for soil and groundwater at the site is complicated because of <br /> saturation of the contaminated soil by the 20-foot rise in the elevation of the water table. Due to the depth <br /> of the soil contamination (below the groundwater, more that 30 feet deep) excavation and ex situ <br /> treatment of the soil is not possible. Also, because of the urban location and congested use of the site, <br /> very 'little space is available for ex situ treatment units. Consequently, alternatives considered included: <br /> 1. In situ attenuation through passive biodegradation; <br /> 2. Enhanced in situ bioremediation and/or chemical oxidation; <br /> 3. Soil Vapor Extraction; <br /> 4. Air Sparging; <br /> . 5. Ex situ groundwater treatment(pump and treat); and <br /> 6. Combinations of Alternatives 2 through 5. <br /> I.L <br />' �a CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.