My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006697
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:24:02 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:36:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006697
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canepa's Car Wash <br /> 6230 Pacific Avenue,Stockton CA <br /> Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report May 2006 <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br /> Vapor Phase Volume Measurements <br /> The airflow though the treatment system catalytic oxidizer has averaged approximately 278 cubic feet per <br /> minute (CFM) since system start-up During the second quarter of 2006 the average flow was <br /> _ _approximately 278 1_CFM Approximately 50% of the airflow is from the groundwater air-stripper and <br /> approximately 50% from the array of nine soil vapor extraction wells Laboratory analysis of a vapor <br /> sample collected from the effluent of the air-stripper and another vapor sample collected from the effluent <br /> of_the_soil vapor extraction welIs,_both_collected at-the_time_of-start-up,-indicated TPH-G-concentrations <br /> of 2 9 and 690 parts per million (ppm), respectively The TPH-G input to the catalytic oxidizer,therefore, <br /> is primarily from the soil vapor extraction wells This is confirmed by weekly FID measurements <br /> - Vapor_Phase-Concentration7Measurements,Calculations,and Quantification <br /> During the second quarter 2006, vapor samples were collected from the catalytic oxidizer influent and <br /> effluent for laboratory analyses on March 30, 2006 PID measurements of the influent and effluent were <br /> also collected at that time For the March 30, 2006 laboratory analyses, TPH-G was not detected at or <br /> above the laboratory reporting limit of 20 0 ppm in both influent and effluent samples Corresponding <br /> PID measurements for the March 30, 2006 influent and effluent analyses were 9 0 ppm and 0 1 ppm, <br /> respectively A correlation has historically been created between the TPH-G concentrations obtained from <br /> the laboratory sample analyses and the PID measurement to provide an empirical correction factor for the <br /> PID measurements However, because TPH-G was not detected in the March 30, 2006 samples, a <br /> correlation was instead created between the laboratory-reported benzene concentration and the PID <br /> measurements This correlation was created for concentrations from the system influent as well as the <br /> system effluent The correction factor for the PID is adjusted on an on-going basis for both system <br /> influent and effluent samples The data and calculations can be found in Appendix D, SVE Vapor Stream <br /> Sample Laboratory Analytical and PID Results - <br /> Fifteen PID measurements of the system influent and effluent were collected between January 31, 2006 <br /> and May 18, 2006 The average PID influent measurement was 40 5 ppm and the average effluent <br /> measurement was 0 1 ppm The average corrected PID reading is calculated using the above mentioned <br /> correction factor, resulting in an average corrected influent PID measurement of 18 3 ppm The average <br /> -—corrected-PID-value-wasmultiplied�by`�the-laboratory-supplied conversion factor of approximately 4 <br /> mg/m3 for TPH-G in different units for use in following calculations_The unit_conversion resulted in an _ <br /> average-influent concentration of 73-2 irig/m -An-average airflow of 278 1-CFM was then used to <br /> calculate the mass of approximately 108 8 pounds of TPH-G removed by the system during the second <br /> quarter of 2006 A similar calculation procedure was followed for the system effluent to calculate the <br /> TPH-G released by the system to the atmosphere Using the airflow of 278 1 CFM, the mass of TPH-G <br /> released by the system was calculated to be approximately 4 76 pounds, resulting in a destructive <br /> efficiency of approximately 95 6%for the period s <br /> Vapor Phase Destructive Efficiency <br /> Of the approximately 10,637 4 pounds of TPH-G removed by the soil vapor extraction system and air- <br /> stripper to'date, the catalytic oxidizer destroyed approximately 10,468 6 pounds and approximately 168 8 <br /> pounds have been released to the atmosphere This results in an overall destructive efficiency of <br /> approximately 98 4% A worksheet showing the SVE calculations for the current quarter is included in <br /> Attachment D, SVE Mass Removal Calculation Worksheet <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The concentration of MTBE at MW-3 was lower than detected during the third and fourth quarters of <br /> 2005, but still remains at elevated levels compared to historically lower levels when monitoring began in <br /> August of 1996 EDB was detected for the third consecutive quarter in MW-1 (5 2 pg/L) The <br /> J CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.