Laserfiche WebLink
Canepa s Car Wash <br /> tr� 6230 Pacific Avenue,Stockton,CA <br /> Third Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report,July 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> • GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND GRADIENT <br /> Groundwater elevation contours estimated for the shallow monitor wells (MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, <br /> MW-6, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-11) on July 22, 2004 indicate that the groundwater gradient is <br /> to the northeast and is generally consistent with previously estimated groundwater gradients (Figure 2, <br /> attached) Monitor well MW-12D was not used in groundwater elevation contouring due to the well's <br /> deep screen interval An estimated groundwater gradient of 0 0047 ft/ft towards the northeast was <br /> measured using water level data from monitor wells MW-6 and MW-9 The average depth to groundwater <br /> measured in the shallow monitor wells for this event increased (decrease in water table elevation) by <br /> approximately 1 64 feet since May 7, 2004 A hydrograph of historic groundwater elevations is attached <br /> as Figure 3 It should be noted that the top of the well screens for shallow monitor wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-7 were below the water table, consistent with much of the monitoring history at the site <br /> Table 2 <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data (July 22, 2004) <br /> Well Casing Well Collar Depth to Groundwater <br /> WELL Screen Elevation Water Elevation <br /> Interval (feet) (feet) (feet) <br /> feet-b s <br /> MW-1 50-70 1548 3944 -23 96 <br /> MW-2 50-70 15 29 3900 -2371 <br /> MW-3 50-70 15 53 3991 -2438 <br /> MW-4 50-70 15 83 4010 -2427 <br /> . MW-5 50-70 1471 3922 -2451 <br /> MW-6 45-65 1489 3829 -23 39 <br /> MW-7 45-65 1580 3937 -2357 <br /> MW-9 25-45 1484 3932 -2448 <br /> MW-10 2545 1472 3826 -2354 <br /> MW-11 25-45 1512 3868 -2356 <br /> MW-12D 100-110 1499 3892 -23 93 <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the monitor wells and SV4 were analyzed for TPH-G by <br /> Method 8015M and benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) and selected gasoline <br /> oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260B by Excelchem Environmental Labs of Roseville, California <br /> (Excelchem) The selected oxygenates/additives included methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), ethanol, <br /> tertiary-butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (D1PE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether <br /> (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) <br /> The current groundwater sample analytical results (see Table 3) are generally consistent with the <br /> historical results (Table A, Attachment C) None of the contaminants of concern were detected at or <br /> above the laboratory reported detection limits in monitor wells MW-4, MW-6, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10 <br /> and MW-12D Monitor well MW-12D has generally shown a decrease in contaminant concentrations <br /> each quarter since monitoring of the deep aquifer began in October of 2001 <br /> • <br /> s <br /> �J CONDOR <br />