Laserfiche WebLink
Continued from 01 <br /> board staff members recommend- <br /> ed that Unocal be allowed to close <br /> the property after one more year <br /> of monitoring. A report by board <br /> staff concluded that "detectable <br /> concentrations of residual petrole- <br /> um at (Unocal's) site do not pose <br /> a threat to human health or safe- <br /> ty or the environment and do not <br /> affect, or threaten to affect, cur- <br /> rent or probable future ... uses of <br /> water." <br /> Kirk said the groundwater basin - <br /> below Pacific Avenue has already Two weeks ago, the county dis- <br /> been affected by pesticides and trict attorney's office filed a $13 <br /> intrusion of salty water from the million lawsuit against Unocal and <br /> Delta Tosco Corp., accusing them of fail <br /> "It would be crazy for anybody ing to take adequate steps to <br /> to sink a well in that groundwa- clean up pollution at several gas <br /> ter; she said. stations in Stockton and Manteca. <br /> County officials disagree. Among the sites was the former <br /> Cotulla said California Water Unocal station at 1665 Pacific, <br /> Service Co., one of Stockton's which opened in the 1940s. <br /> major water providers, has a well Tosca bought Unocal's gas sta- <br /> less than a half-mile away. And dons in 1997 after Unocal got out <br /> without adequate monitoring, it's of the gasoline-retailing business. <br /> impossible to tell how far the Kirk called the lawsuit an <br /> plume of contaminated ground- improper attempt to dissuade <br /> water has spread vertically or hor- Unocal from appealing its case to <br /> izontally, she said. the state water board. <br /> Concentrations of benzene and "We have a right under the <br /> other chemicals have barely constitution and the statute to <br /> sa�ged in the last decade, they take our case to the state water <br /> board," she said. <br /> County officials say the compa- David Irey, the county's envi- <br /> ny actually has made only mini- ronmental prosecutor, said he <br /> mal attempts to clean up the pol- filed the lawsuit because Unocal <br /> lution— excavating contaminated and Tosco were not complying <br /> soil in 1988 and installing a with the law. Unocal and the <br /> vapor-extraction system in 1996 county had been in negotiations <br /> that vented off petroleum fumes. for more than two years to try to <br /> The system operated only a few settle the case, but those talks <br /> months. broke down and the oil company <br /> "That's the only actual remedi- flied its petition with the state. <br /> ation that's been done on the "At that point, Unocal was well- <br /> site," Cotulla said. "The rest has aware that a lawsuit would be <br /> just been monitoring." filed," he said. <br />