Laserfiche WebLink
®RAFT <br /> site cleanup is consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the state and will meet the <br /> applicable objectives in the Central Valley RWQCB Basin Plan within a reasonable time frame. <br /> The County's contentions are not'supported by the facts in the record. As explained <br /> below, the facts show that both aerobic and anaerobic biologic degradation of residual petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents is occurring at the site. The facts further show that all down-gradient h�5�- <br /> monitor wells extend to and below the depth interval where the highest documented <br /> � g <br /> Lo <br /> concentrations of dissolved phase hydrocarbons have been detecied at the site. r too I <br /> � dclti� <br /> The primary sources of the release(the USTs, dispenser, and associated piping)have <br /> �s l <br /> 5l�e� <br /> r,''"WZ011 well as a substantial volume of affected soil from the immediate vicinity of the 5 hoIJ <br /> oa_5 L� been removed as <br /> Gfeakes} former USTs. Free product has never been observed in any site monitor wells and SVE has S <br /> Ga removed a substantial mass of residual petroleum hydrocarbons in the vicinityof the former <br /> VVI V_A <br /> pump island. <br /> With regard to affected groundwater and its potential to adversely impact current or <br /> anticipated future beneficial uses, substantial evidence in the record indicates that concentrations <br /> of dissolved phase hydrocarbons are decreasing, the plume is stable, MTBE is not present as a <br /> consequence of the release, and attenuation and biologic degradation of residual petroleum �a <br /> hydrocarbons in site soil and groundwater is occurring. Further, available data indicate that the <br /> Y gr , <br /> affected groundwater monitored by site wells, in addition to being of inferior quality, is not <br /> hydraulically connected to the deeper groundwater aquifers that are used locally for,municipal, <br /> industrial or agricultural supply. <br /> The highest documented concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in site �f of I 1 <br /> pct r r-�r��f <br /> groundwater are in samples from monitor well MW-2 (this well is completed to a depth of <br /> 50 feet at the location of the former pump island where the release occurred). Concentrations of <br /> TPH-g and benzene typically ranged from 100,000 to 200,000 ppb and 6,000 to 25,000 ppb, <br /> respectively, from 1988 through 1994; concentrations of these constituents have declined to <br /> about 80,000 and 2,400 ppb, respectively, as demonstrated by the monitoring results of the past <br /> year. Reported concentrations of TPH-g and benzene iri groundwater samples from the monitor <br /> well MW-4 (immediately down-gradient of MW-2 and completed to a depth of 54 feet) have <br /> ranged from 69 to 460 ppb and "non-detect" to 2.0 ppb, respectively' (32 sampling events over <br /> nine years). Other down-gradient wells, MW-5 (completed to a depth of 55 feet) and <br /> MW-7 (completed to a depth of 60 feet), have infrequently detected low concentrations of <br /> One sample,collected in August 1992,had a reported TPH-g concentration of 3,000 ppb. <br /> 9 <br />