Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Investigation December 12, 1990 <br /> Former Unocal Station No. 2859, Stockton, California AGS 38012-5 <br /> Additional excavation was conducted at the request of Unocal anti with the approval of the <br /> San Joaquin Public Health Services (S3PHS). The tank cavity as enlarged to <br /> approximately 25 by 35 feet and a bench was cut into the vialls of the excavation to a depth <br /> of 7 to 8 feet. An excavator was lowered onto this bench and continued to excavate below <br /> the former tanks. The total depth of tb cavity varied from approximately 26 to 30 feet <br /> below grade. Soil sample S-0329.9A was collected at 26 feet below grade under the former <br /> northern tank; TPHg was detected at 13 ppm. The concentration of BTEX compounds <br /> ! ranged from below detection limits to 1.32 ppm. <br /> After receiving results of analyses of soil samples collected directly under the former tanks, <br /> excavation continued in the area of the southern side wall and under the former tank T-1. <br /> Soil sample S-0406-12A was collected at 28 feet below grade from the south side wall and <br /> results indicated BTEX concentrations were above 1.0 ppm. The area was excavated further <br /> and soil sample S-0406-13A was collected from 30 feet below grade under the former tank. <br /> Results indicated the TPfig concentration was 3 ppm and BTEX concentrations were below <br /> detection limits for the methods used. <br /> 'Me product lines were removed and the trenches were excavated. Soil sarjple S-0330-11 � <br /> was collected under the former product piping between the dispenser islznds as shown on <br /> Plate P-2. Analyses indicated TPHg at 6 ppm and BTEX compounds were below detection <br /> limits for the methods used (Table 2). <br /> The former waste-oil tank cavity was excavated to approximately 8 feet below grade and a <br /> soil sample wap zollected. Laboratory results indicated the concentrations of TPHg,BTEX, <br /> organic lead, volatile organic compounds and polychlorinated biphenyls were below <br /> detection, limits for the methods used (Table 2). <br /> 6 <br />