Laserfiche WebLink
July 30, 1992 <br /> Former Unocal Station 2859, Stockton, California Working To Restore Nature <br /> A <br /> RESNA began periodic monitoring of the ground water in June 1988 Dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons were detected in water samples collected from the five wells, the highest <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbons were detected in well MW-2. The direction of ground-water <br /> flow was to the northeast from June 1988 to May 1990 (before the wells were dry) In <br /> February 1992,we observed drilling of five soil borings and installation of one downgradient, <br /> offsite monitoring well (MW-7), one onsite monitoring well (MW-6), and three onsite vapor- <br /> extraction wells (VW-1, VW-2, and VW-3) <br /> PRESENT GROUND-WATER SAMPLING <br /> i <br /> A technician from RESNA was onsite May 21, 1992, to measure depths to ground water and <br /> collect ground-water samples from wells MW-4, MW-5, MW-6, and MW-7 for subjective and <br /> laboratory analyses, wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were dry Our procedures used are <br /> summarized in an attachment to this report The technician noted no subjective evidence <br /> of hydrocarbons in the four wells, except for an obvious product odor in samples from wells <br /> MW-5 and MW-6 (Table 1) <br /> The purge water was stored onsite in labeled 17-E steel drums pending the results of <br /> . laboratory analyses At Unocal's request, drummed water was removed and disposed of by <br /> i Armour Petroleum Service and Equipment Corporation of Fairfield, California, on June 19, <br /> 1992 <br /> Evaluation of Ground-Water Gradient <br /> The ground-water gradient on May 21, 1992, was 0 003, with a flow direction to the <br /> northeast (Plate 3) The ground-water flow direction and gradient are consistent with those <br /> evaluated on March 4, 1992, and before May 1990 The depth to water in each well is <br /> shown on Table 2 The ground-water surface dropped an average of 0 7 feet since the <br /> March 1992 monitoring event Survey information is discussed in an attachment to this <br /> i report <br /> Laboratory Analyses and Results <br /> The water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> using modified Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Method 8015 and benzene,toluene, <br /> « ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers (BTEX) using EPA Method 602. Laboratory <br /> analyses were performed at RESNA Environmental Laboratories in Rancho Cordova, <br /> California (Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory No E773). The water sample collected <br /> from well MW-7 was also analyzed for fecal coliform bacteria at FGL Environmental <br /> 0528bbou <br /> 38012-9 2 <br />