Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Well and Sparge Points installation Report—Fortner Unocal Station#2859,Stockton,CA <br /> August 19,2002 <br /> During the May 13 and 14, 2002 event, TPHg range hydrocarbons were reported in wells MW-2 (18,000 <br /> ppb), MW-10 (100,000 ppb), MW-11 (40,000 ppb), MW-17 (65 ppb), and NP-1 (53 ppb) Benzene was <br /> reported in wells MW-2 (2,300 ppb), MW-10 (3,300 ppb), MW-11 (790 ppb), MW-20 (1 2 ppb), and <br /> NP-1 (0 53 ppb) Methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) was reported in well MW-9 at a concentration of 5 3 <br /> ppb by EPA Method 8021 B <br /> Vapor Extraction Test <br /> GR performed a five-day vapor extraction (VE)test at the site from June 18 through 22, 2001 The purpose <br /> of the VE test was to evaluate the feasibility of the VE technology and collect needed site specific data for <br /> the design of a VE system if deemed necessary The VE test was performed for a total of 39 hours An IC <br /> engine was used to extract vapors from wells VW-1,VW-2, and VW-3 <br /> Air samples were collected from the influent and effluent vapor streams Petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations detected in the influent vapor stream were up to 311 ppmv of TPHg, and up to 2 2 ppmv of <br /> benzene MtBE was not detected The only well where significant concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons were removed was well VW-3 <br /> Based on the VE monitoring data, no significant amount of TPHg or benzene were removed during the pilot <br /> test It is estimated that less than one pound per day of petroleum hydrocarbons could be extracted Vapor <br /> extraction would have little or no effect at this site <br /> • FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> In order to further delineate the extent of the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume in the vicinity of the <br /> subject site and to remediate groundwater beneath the site, GR installed two additional off-site <br /> groundwater monitoring wells (MW-20 and MW-21) and installed eight on-site C-Sparge"m wells and <br /> supporting equipment at the locations shown on Figure 2 Field work was performed in accordance with <br /> GR's Site Safety Plan #240072 06, dated February 28, 2002 GR Field Methods and Procedures are <br /> included in Appendix A Underground Service Alert was notified at least 48 hours prior to beginning site <br /> activities The wells were installed by Woodward Drilling, Inc (C57 #710079) under SJCPHS-EHD <br /> permits #28980 and #28981, and City of Stockton encroachment permit #66460 Copies of the permits <br /> are included in Appendix B <br /> The two groundwater monitoring wells and eight C-SpargeTM wells were installed on March 4 through 8, <br /> 2002 Wells MW-20 and MW-21 were drilled to depths of 90 and 60 feet bgs, respectively C-SpargeTM <br /> wells SP-lA, SP-2A, and SP-3A were drilled to a depth of approximately 30 feet bgs, wells SP-113, <br /> SP-213, and SP-313 were drilled to a depth of approximately 60 feet bgs, and wells SP-1C and SP-2C were <br /> drilled to a depth of approximately 90 feet bgs A truck-mounted drill rig equipped with 8-inch-diameter <br /> hollow-stem augers was used to drill all wells A GR geologist observed the drilling activities For wells <br /> MW-20 and MW-21, soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals for description and preparation of a <br /> log, and for possible chemical analysis Soil samples were not collected from the C-SpargeTM well <br /> borings Locations of newly installed wells are shown on Figure 2 Boring logs and copies of the Well <br /> Completion Reports are included in Appendix C <br /> is <br /> 24007206-1 3 <br />