Laserfiche WebLink
1 ✓ <br /> 25 <br /> groundwater levels at the center of the depression rose approximately 30 feet during the <br /> interval and that the large depression centered on Stockton no longer exists This rising <br /> groundwater condition brackets the tune period in which the service station at the Site was <br /> ' remodeled and underground storage tanks were removed <br /> ' Figures 5-1 and 5-2 indicate that the maximum concentrations in both soul and <br /> groundwater samples collected while drilling and sampling NP-1 at the Site occurred at a depth <br /> ' of 60 feet bgs Soil samples taken at three depths (spaced on 10-foot intervals) both above and <br /> below the depth interval of unpact were nondetect for both TPHg and benzene <br /> The historic record of groundwater levels in the Site vicinity, the removal of the USTs <br /> ' during the 1967 station remodel, the 1988 station demolition and fuel dispensing equipment <br /> removal, and the vertical distnbution of constituent concentrations as indicated by the NP-1 <br /> ' data, indicate that the Site release occurred during a previous time when groundwater levels <br /> were lower and that groundwater has subsequently risen into the zone of soil impact The NP- <br /> 1 data also indicate that impacts from the removed surface source and residual concentrations <br /> in vadose zone soils are not the result of ongoing migration downward and impact to saturated <br /> ' zone soils <br /> The Site release has resulted in a dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon groundwater plume <br /> of limited extent Free-phase petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE have not been detected at <br /> ' the Site <br /> ' 6.3 LATERAL EXTENT OF SITE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON IMPACTS <br /> 6.3.1 Soillmpacts <br /> 1 - <br /> ' Previous investigations conducted at the Site indicate that hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> m the soil appear to be limited to the area around the former product islands No offsite soil <br /> ' impacts have been observed or documented The SJCPHS concluded in a letter received by <br /> UNOCAL on January 9, 1997 that the assessment of soil contamination at the Site was <br />