Laserfiche WebLink
' ARCADIS GERAGH Y&MILLER <br /> groundwater analytical data between 1989 and 1993. Based on the results of an <br /> analysis presented in PEG's Work Plan (August 6, 1993), PEG concluded that the <br /> data indicated that the configuration of the hydrocarbon plume has remained rela- <br /> tively stable over the 4-year period Based on recent groundwater monitoring data, <br /> the distribution of hydrocarbons in shallow groundwater beneath the site appears to <br /> remain stable PEG has attributed this finding, and ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller <br /> concurs, to the combination of the fine-grained sediments underlying the site, the <br /> ' relatively shallow gradient, and the effects of natural attenuation and degradation <br /> processes <br /> ' PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK <br /> ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller developed this scope of work to vertically <br /> ' delineate dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon impact in groundwater. The scope <br /> of work includes installation of one soil boring, collection of depth-discrete <br /> groundwater samples from the saturated zone, completion of a nested piezometer <br /> ' beneath the current level of groundwater, and preparation of a Corrective Action Plan <br /> All work will be performed under the supervision of a geologist registered in the State <br /> of California. In addition, all field work will be performed in accordance with a site- <br /> specific health and safety plan previously developed for the site by Pacific <br /> Environmental <br /> ' Focused Subsurface investigation <br /> ' SJCPHS requested, in meetings with UNOCAL, that the vertical extent of <br /> impacts at the site be delineated by advancing a soil boring at the center of the plume <br /> and taking depth discrete soil samples until a depth is reached at which sample <br /> chemical analysis indicates concentrations that are nondetect for the constituents of <br /> ' concern <br /> It is the opinion of ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller that drilling through the <br /> ' center of the area of known soil contamination is not advisable and would <br /> unnecessarily present the risk of cross-contaminating lower geologic strata with liquid <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons which, although not previously detected, could potentially <br /> ' exist in strata higher up in the geologic profile Such cross-contamination, if it <br /> occurred, could increase the degree of impact to groundwater quality and significantly <br /> increase the cost and time to achieve site cleanup Saturated zone soil sample results <br /> ' also do not provide a superior basis for determining potential impacts to groundwater <br /> quality beneath the site. The most accurate and representative method of assessing <br /> impacts to groundwater quality is to sample the groundwater Soil sampling in a <br /> ' borehole placed in,the center of the plume will also not provide a superior data set with <br /> which to formulatte a cost-effective method of cleanup at the site A groundwater <br /> flur rer_ Page <br /> ' ucM sarrrA,.eaKsnsnAMArA%APRo_ssowiuocw.+c YnLtenwas arv+aaCWWZkooc 5111 <br />