Laserfiche WebLink
rf <br /> ARCADIS GERAGHTY&MILLER <br /> ' convenience of the automated calculation, unless a formal <br /> evaluation of the uncertainty is also included as part of the <br /> assessment <br /> Some regulatory agencies have in the past used more simplified <br /> calculations than those described above to set soil concentration <br /> guidance levels which are designed to be protective of <br /> groundwater These approaches have declined in usage and <br /> application as the knowledge of contaminant fate and transport has <br /> ' increased Ultimately, these approaches utilize simplified models <br /> which are no Iess uncertain than the calculation methodology <br /> described above <br /> ' Currently, there is no approach that can be considered more useful <br /> and viable for monitoring a resource medium than actually taking a <br /> ' sample of that medium itself The approach presented in the work <br /> plan goes beyond predicting future impacts by providing the means <br /> (through the installation of a sampling point) of acquiring real-time, <br /> tangible data which demonstrates the water quality status of the site <br /> ' groundwater <br /> It is the opinion of ARCADIS Geraghty and Maller that it is not <br /> necessary or appropriate to acquire saturated zone soil samples at <br /> this site in order to assess the current or future potential impacts to <br /> groundwater at the site Groundwater samples, as previously <br /> ' collected at the site and proposed in this work plan, are a superior <br /> approach <br /> However, in order to demonstrate UNOCAL's desire to cooperate <br /> and collaborate with SJCPHS, ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller will <br /> collect and analyze unsaturated zone and saturated zone soil <br /> 1 samples at the sampling point proposed in the May 26, 1998 work <br /> plan according to the protocols described in Attachment A (also <br /> included in the May 26, 1998 work plan) Separate soil and <br /> ' groundwater samples will be simultaneously taken at 10-foot <br /> intervals, using the simulprobe technology, starting at ground <br /> surface down to total boring depth Sampling will continue, as <br /> ' indicated in the May 26, 1998 work plan, to a minimum depth of 70 <br /> feet bgs and until two successive samples in a row contain no <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, or MTBE Below the <br /> first encountered water, samples will be taken at maximum of 10- <br /> foot intervals or at changes in hthology Samples will be submitted <br /> to a California State Certified Laboratory under chain of custody <br /> and analyzed for the petroleum hydrocarbon constituents of interest <br /> ' SJCPHS as described in section A.6 of the Attachement to the work plan <br /> Comment In paragraph 6, your letter states, "The proposed soil boring should <br /> ' be located further south and closer to MW2 " <br />