Laserfiche WebLink
m _ I <br /> 5 <br /> Discussions with laboratory analysts and remediation engine,.-As indicate that it is widely believed <br /> chat the greatest number, of false positives will occur when low concentrations (<I00 ug,/L.) <br /> This: is su b recent studies b /mobile Oil and S loll <br /> 2,0. T <br /> MTAE art reed b EPA 80 Y <br /> � y <br /> Development Company which predict that false positive de=—dons of,Y=E will tend to =ur <br /> when <20-50 u&L conccatrarions of NME M reported by EPA method 8020. The data <br /> an2lyzed in this report strongly contradict these expectations. The reported EPA=0 <br /> values for the 2 false positivesi this data set are ? and 5300 . Therefore,n ..40 r reser tl <br /> the reported EPA 8x20 concentration (above 20 ug/L) have no predictive value for <br /> indicating the probability of false positire this-identifica(ions. <br /> New samples were obLdmed from tfie well previously reporting a false positive EPA 8020 value <br /> of 5300 ug/L. Both GC/PM and GC/-MS analysis performed at Lawrence Liverrnore i`ta.tiona l <br /> LaboratcrY aJ-NL) confirmed ND levels or,'YME. Our analysis also confirmed the PMsence of <br /> damteeethylpentane, a gasoline component which can co--elute with WME.Iead2�o.g to `clue <br /> non or ovcreGdn atioth Cd MTBE conc=mtions b EPA A s020. 3-taeshylpeatanc was also <br /> independently demoted in these samples by Shell Development Company research labprazories. <br /> T7hemforc, this example shows that gasoline comoonenrs present in LUFT ground water,have <br /> been mis-idcntined as MTBE by EPA 8020 analysis. Other laboratories have reported that the <br /> Pr=ncz of 2rmethylpentane in LUFT ground water samples can result in false dere:ion or <br /> MTBE. Therefore, we suggest that analytical laboratories perform an "interference shed:'• <br /> analysis of a 3-tnethyipentane and 2-mettiylpentane standards in the presentee and absence <br /> of NITBE to evaluate whether this compound co-dotes with NfTBF under routine <br /> conditions used in their laboratory for EPA 8020 analysis. <br /> It is our opinion that as analytical laboratories opalmize conditions to detect and gaanrfy . fMF <br /> by EPA 8020 in thepresence of 3- and?-tnc:hylpentane, both she number and torte.-atiacoa of <br /> , <br /> reported false positives will decrmse. In addidoncurrent State of Cafifotaia regularioas mare <br /> tu <br /> use of a single column for analysis of ground wafer samples containing gasoline. The, <br /> Association of Caiiiarnia -rest <br /> zag Labmawrlcs (ac�jAx3S) has recommended the use of a send <br /> canfirtnation column for duction of MTBE in the presence of gasoline to possibly rrdac:, the <br /> num be: of false positives detec=d by EPA 8020 (acrtFEV+rS vol. 7, issue 3, fuly 1996). Be..�use <br /> Che quality of 12jA 8020 data may improve due to opn <br /> timizarions of GC pM separation. <br /> conditions and/or the use of a second calumn, we recommend that a comparison of E.n. &020 <br /> continue. <br /> and 8240 data should be performed in the furore to evaluate whether trends from this data sec <br /> Agreement of analytical v2jues reported for EPA 8020 and EPA824Q: For our araIyss, <br /> RPD values gmater that: 4051? west unacc=mble, d:monsw- -g a significant di-�xnce berween <br /> the values abraiaei by these two analytics/rhe-.}�odz We reviewed elate classes of MISE data <br /> sarnalcs with ND or low cowentmdons of gasoline conmounds, sarnples with high <br /> concentrations of gasaline and low coueenaltiOns of MTBE, and samples with both Izxgn <br /> concentrations of gasoline and MTBE. <br /> In gene:-al, we found agreement between the WME cothcenaadons reporr�i by both rne:hcds <br /> was fair for the 48 samples that did not contain elevated concenaudons of gasoline carnoounds; <br /> 27°,b had Rl?rJ values great=: than 40% (13 of 48 samples containing ND to 7"J ug2.BTrX <br /> and/or 7 ug/L B compounds). Interestingly, in the zsha)ority of these cases (9 out & 13), tits <br /> ?vi E cance:ncadon reponCd by EPA 8024 was sighhincantly lower L�an the reside 13),daetm-d by <br /> EPA $�. We have no explanation as to why EPA 8020 would tend to produce a Dower <br /> analytical valve Chan EPA 87so in auprnzim2tely 19% of the samples that do not contain <br /> elevated concentrations of gasoline compounds. <br /> Only S samples contained cievated conce:htradons of gasoline compounds (BTEX ancJor,3 <br /> compounds at concrnaadcas greater or equal to 200 ug/L) and low coat==s or of ylT3E <br /> 2 <br />