Laserfiche WebLink
' 09 March I998 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 2 of 5 <br />' 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> The ground water levels in the monitoring wells were allowed to recover for a minimum of one hour <br /> prior to sample collection Ground water samples were collected utilizing disposable polyethylene <br /> bailers and new nylon rope Sufficient ground water sample was collected from each well to fill three <br /> 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a preservative for the <br />' samples and a one liter amber bottle Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not <br /> present In the VOA vials after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled <br /> with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> I <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California state-certified laboratory for analysis in accordance with EPA method <br /> 8015M for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively), In accordance with EPA method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl <br /> • benzene and xylene BTE&X)with methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE), and In accordance with EPA <br /> method 8260 for volatile organics (including oxygenates) The laboratory report (Castle Analytical <br /> Laboratory Reference No 1405 and McCampbell Analytical Inc Lab I D 84929 to 84940) and <br /> chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 3 0. FINDINGS <br /> 3 I RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> EThe depths to ground water in the monitoring wells were measured between 30 88 and 33 25 feet <br /> below the top of the well casings Between October 1997 and January 1998, depth to ground water <br /> decreased an average 1 08 feet at the site <br /> During the January 1998 ground water monitoring event, the gradient was calculated to be 0 003 <br /> ft/ft, or approximately 17 feet per mile (Figure 3) Ground water monitoring data collected In the area <br /> of the monitoring wells suggests that the ground water flow direction was generally toward the <br /> northeast The ground water elevation data for the monitoring wells during the January 1998 ground <br /> water monitoring event is depicted In Figure 3 <br /> • <br /> Advanced CcoEn,tronmental,Inc <br />