Laserfiche WebLink
! 18 December 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />! Page 5 of 10 <br />! well utilizing a dedicated, disposable polyethylene bailer and new nylon rope Sufficient sample was <br /> collected from each well to fill three 40-m1 EPA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as <br /> a preservative, and two I-liter amber bottle Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were <br />! not present in the VOAs after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with <br /> the well designation, date, time, and samplers initials <br />! Following collection, each sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed in a chilled <br /> container and transported to CAL for analysis by previously noted EPA methods for TPH-g,TPH-d, <br /> BTE&X, MTBE, and by EPA Method 8260 for TBA, DIPE, ETRE, TAME, and to confirm and <br /> quantify any MTBE detected by EPA Method 8020 The results of the analysis are contained in <br /> Table No 3 <br /> 25 DISSOLVED MANGANESE AND IRON <br /> Based on the guide How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies For UST Sites (October <br /> 1994) published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of USTs,the <br /> presence of dissolved iron(Fe+2) in ground water can reduce the permeability of the saturated zone <br /> lie soils during air sparging operations The guide further states in Exhibit VII-12 Dissolved iron And <br /> Air Sparging Effectiveness that concentrations of dissolved Fe+2 less than 10 mg/l are acceptable <br /> concentrations for air sparging, concentrations between 10 mg/l and 20 mg/1 would require periodic <br /> testing or periodic replacement, if concentrations were greater than 20 mg/l, than air sparging was <br /> not recommended <br /> In preparation for in-situ air sparging at the site, one ground water sample was collected from AW1 <br /> (Interval A), logged on a chain of custody form, placed in a chilled container and transported to <br /> I Alpha Analytical Laboratories Inc (AAL) for analysis of Manganese and Iron The results of the <br /> analysis are contained in Table 2 <br /> 26 STOCKPILE SOIL SAMPLES <br /> On 04 November 1997, four soil samples were collected from AW1 and AW2 stockpiled soil <br /> cuttings utilizing a slide-hammer and brass sleeves under the supervision of the PHS-EHD The <br /> stockpile soil samples were submitted to Castle Analytical Laboratories for one composite analysis <br /> of TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, TBA and MTBE in accordance with above <br /> mentioned EPA methods Analytical results of the composite soil sample are summarized in Table <br /> 4 The laboratory report (Castle Analytical Laboratory Reference No 1316) and chain-of-custody are <br /> included in Appendix D <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />