Laserfiche WebLink
09 September 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 4 of 8 <br />' auger The filter pack was placed adjacent to the screen (0 020 inch screen size) from the bottom of <br /> the boring to a point approximately 2 feet above the top of the screen An approximate three-foot seal <br /> of bentonite clips was placed above the filter pack and hydrated with clean tap water The remairung <br /> annular space was sealed with grout As-built monitoring well construction diagrams are included as <br /> Figure Nos 3 through 6 -Moniloy mg Well Con struction Drag ant <br /> 3 6 SURVEYING <br />' A reference point was marked on the top of each well head, and surveyed the to the nearest 0 01 foot <br /> to determine the elevation relative to existing wells The results of the monitoring well survey are <br /> contained in Table 3 -Relative G ound Water Elevations <br /> I3 7 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> On 02 August 1996, monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4 were developed utilizing a two-stage <br /> submersible pump Ground water was purged from each well until each well was essentially sediment <br /> free Approximately 20 gallons of ground water were purged from each monitoring well Purged <br /> ground water was containerized in properly labeled D O T model 17H 55-gallon drums and stored <br /> on-site in an area inaccessible to the general public <br /> 3 8 QUARTERLY MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> On 05 August 1995, ground water levels and total well depths at MW-1 through MW-4 were <br /> measured to the nearest 0 01 foot utilizing a Solist water level meter Ground water surface elevations <br /> were plotted on a scaled site map, whereupon ground-water surface elevation contours were <br /> generated (Figure 7 - Relative Ground Watei Elevations) Ground water monitoring at tlus time <br /> Iindicated that ground water flow beneath the site was generally to the northeast at a gradient of about <br /> 0 002, or approximately 12 feet per mile <br /> After water levels were measured approximately six to eight gallons of ground water (a minimum <br /> of three well volumes) were purged from MW-I through MW-4 utilizing a two-stage submersible <br /> pump Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured at well volume intervals using an ICM <br /> model 52200 water analyzer Stabilization data and field logs are included in Appendix B Purged <br /> ground water was stored in 55-gallon drums stored on-site in an area inaccessible to the general <br /> public <br /> Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-4 were purged and allowed to recover for a minimum of one <br /> Ihour prior to sample collection Ground water samples were collected from MW-I through MW-4 <br />