My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005721
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
2402
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545640
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 2:50:53 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 1:52:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005721
RECORD_ID
PR0545640
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003900
FACILITY_NAME
PACIFIC PRIDE COMMERCIAL FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
2402
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12506001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2402 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 November 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0173 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> measured from each well for stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals using an Oakton water <br /> analyzer. Field data and logs are included in Appendix A. Purged ground water was containerized <br /> in 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site in an area lacking general public access. <br /> r <br /> 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Following well purging,ground water levels in the wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge <br /> prior to sample collection. Subsequently,ground water samples were collected from the purged wells <br /> utilizing new,disposable polyethylene bailers and transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials <br /> �- containing 0.5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative. Care was taken to ensure that <br /> visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping. Ground water sample <br /> containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials. <br /> 2.3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> After labeling,each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled <br /> container and transported to a California Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified laboratory <br /> to be analyzed for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) by EPA Method 8015C <br /> �- Modified; <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene and xylene(BTEX)and methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) <br /> by EPA Method 8021 B; and <br /> • MTBE,tert-amyl methyl ether(TAME),tertiary butanol(TBA),di-isopropyl ether(DIPS), <br /> ethyl tert butyl ether(ETBE), 1,2-dichloro ethane(1,2-DCA)and ethylene-dibromide(EDB) <br /> by EPA Method 8260B. <br /> 3.0. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTIONIIN-SITU AIR SPARGE SYSTEM <br /> Between 11 June 2002 and 26 September 2002, SVE remediation was in continual operation at the <br /> site, utilizing a Solleco Ecat 250 catalytic converter vapor extraction system to apply an induced <br /> vacuum to wells VW-1 through VW-7;during this time,IAS remediation was selectively continued <br /> with air sparging through wells AW-1 through AW-7. SVE and IAS procedures for the site were <br /> described in the AGE-prepared Remedial Action Work Plan dated 30 December 1998,and approved <br /> by the EHD by letter dated 20 April 1999. <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmcntal,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.