My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
4511
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545641
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 3:06:11 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 2:11:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
RECORD_ID
PR0545641
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002480
FACILITY_NAME
SHOP N GO 3
STREET_NUMBER
4511
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
11023011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4511 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Pacific Mini Mart � � Page 2 of 3 <br /> 4511 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA October 29, 2008 <br /> bsg either were not impacted or were not analyzed. Therefore, the only points of <br /> comparison that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the SVE system are from <br /> the two adjacent borings B-4 (advanced in October 1992) and B-21 (advance in October <br /> 2007). Comparing the TPH-g concentrations at 25 feet bsg, B-4 contained 1,677 mg/kg <br /> and .B-21 contained less than.1.0 mg/kg, which suggests that the SVE system effectively <br /> removed the contamination from the vadose zone soil above 35 feet in the B-4/8-21 <br /> area. AGE made no recommendation concerning what to do with the SVE system which <br /> is currently not in operation. <br /> in the SRCR, AGE recommends preparation of a closure summary report when <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in groundwater samples from vapor <br /> well VW-1 have achieved compliance with water quality objectives (WQOs) or when <br /> levels have been reduced to the point that WQOs can be achieved by natural <br /> attenuation. <br /> The EHD believes that the site is not ready for closure consideration at this time. The <br /> analytical results from the confirmation boring soil samples from saturated soil below 35 <br /> feet bsg showed contaminant concentrations exceeding the SFBRWQCB ESLs for <br /> leaching potential into groundwater and dissolved contaminant concentrations exceeded <br /> the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) WQOs. <br /> Groundwater contamination in MW-5 may be rebounding since the shutdown of the <br /> GWE system in April 2006, as shown by rising concentrations of TPH-g, which increased <br /> • from less than 50.0,ug/I in April 2006 to 8,500 ug/I in October 2006. During March 2008, <br /> TPH-g concentrations in MW-4, MW-5, and VW-1 were 200 pg/l, 3,900 pg/I, and 900 <br /> pg/I, respectively. It appears that the groundwater plume is defined laterally cross <br /> gradient by MW-1, MW-3, and MW-6, upgradient by MW-7, and downgradient by <br /> MW11A, MW-1.1 B, MW-12 A and B, and MW-13 though MW-18 with no detections of the <br /> constituents of concern since October 2006. <br /> The EHD believes that least two more quarters of monitoring data (4th quarter 2008 and <br /> 1st quarter 2009) will be needed to evaluate contaminant concentration trends before <br /> closure consideration. The sampling frequency for unimpacted monitoring wells can be <br /> reduced. As discussed by telephone with your consultant on June 18, 2008, total <br /> ` petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPH-d) can be eliminated from the suite of . <br /> constituents for routine sample analysis., If the site contaminant plume is stable and <br /> declining in extent and concentrations in the absence of active remediation, this site may <br /> be a good candidate for closure. If site conditions appear to be favorable for closure after <br /> the next two quarterly monitoring events, a closure summary report may be submitted to <br /> the EHD for review. The closure report should address residual contamination issues, <br /> including an estimate of the contaminant mass remaining verses the contaminant mass <br /> removed from remediation activities, fate and transport modeling, vapor intrusion <br /> potential, the projected time to return to background conditions, and why the site can be . <br /> considered a low-risk site despite locally exceeding SFBRWQCB ESLs and CVRWQCB <br /> WQOs. Site closure is dependent on favorable resolution of these issues and <br /> confirmation that the dissolved plume is stable and declining without active remediation. <br /> If site conditions are not favorable for closure, additional remediation may be needed, to <br /> achieve WQOs in a timely manner. <br /> In summary, the EHD directs at least two more quarters of monitoring data (4th quarter <br /> 2008 and 1" quarter 2009), the sampling frequency for non-critical monitoring wells may <br /> be reduced if requested and justified by your consultant. Total petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> quantified as diesel (TPH-d) can be eliminated from the suite of constituents for routine <br /> sample analysis. <br /> 081029directive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.