Laserfiche WebLink
' 01 June 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0128 <br />' Page 2 of 5 <br />' water was treasured to ensure that a minimum of 80%well-volume recharge had been achieved prior <br /> to sampling <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br />' A water sample was collected from each well using a new, clean, disposable plastic bailer <br /> Immediately upon retrieval, samples were transferred into three 40-milliliter (ml) EPA-approved <br />' volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample <br /> preservative and into one 1-liter amber bottle without the preservative The samples were logged on <br /> a chain-of-custody form, stored in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to <br />' McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified <br /> laboratory The ground water samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 5015 Modified, <br /> . Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons - benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br />' and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) m accordance with EPA Method 8020, and <br /> Oxygenated compounds - di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br />' MTBE, tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), methanol, ethanol, <br /> ethylene dibrormde (EDB) and 1,2--dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) m accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260 <br /> I <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS - <br /> Ground water elevations were determined by subtracting the measured depths-to-water from the <br /> surveyed 'casing elevations Ground water flow directions were determined by contouring the water <br /> elevations on a scaled site plan (Figure 3) The impact of the unauthorized release on ground water <br /> was quantified by laboratory analysis of samples collected during the quarter <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The average ground water elevation on 24 April 2001 was approximately 0 30 feet higher than the <br /> average ground water elevation during the January 2001 monitoring event The ground water table <br /> -- — --occurred-witbin the screened-intervals-of-the wells-monitored,-with-the-exception of the deeply -- - <br /> sci eened monitoring wells (MW-1 to MW-3, MW-11 B and MW-12B) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvtronmental Inc <br />