Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> 4.0 SOIL DISPOSAL <br /> On December 20, 1993, 12 drums of soil were removed from the site and transported across <br /> the street to 742 Rose Marie Lane The drums contained auger returns from borings 133 <br /> through B7 Analytical results from B3 and 135 through B7 had previously indicated that soil <br /> from these borings was not contaminated, and this soil was spread evenly over the back yard <br /> of the residence at 742 Rose Marie Lane Contaminated soil from B1, B2, and the <br /> Iexploratory trench remains drummed at the site In the first quarter of 1994, GeoAudit will <br /> request permission from the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Management District to aerate <br /> this soil at 742 Rose Marie Lane <br /> 5.0 WATER DISPOSAL <br /> IIn September, 1993, analytical results of water samples collected during previous quarterly <br /> monitoring events at the site were transmitted to Mr Larry Williams at the City of Stockton <br /> Department of Municipal Utilities A request to dispose of the drummed water in the city <br /> sewer was made at that time Subsequently, Mr Williams required GeoAudit to analyze the <br /> drummed water for other volatile and semi-volatile hydrocarbons in accordance with EPA <br /> methods 624 and 625 Samples were collected from two drums on October 25, 1993 and <br /> transmitted to Zymax Envirotechnology for analysis The samples were analyzed by gas <br /> chromatograph/mass spectrometer One sample was reported as non-detect for all target <br /> analytes, the other sample was non-detect for all analytes except chloroform (1 9 ppb) and <br /> 1,1-Dichloroethane (2 0 ppb) The analytical results are included in Attachment B Based <br /> on these results, permission to dispose of the water was granted on December 13, 1993 <br /> An attempt was made to dispose of the water on December 20, 1993 However, a sewer <br /> clean-out could not be located on the site at that time, and assistance in locating a suitable <br /> Idisposal point has been made to the City <br /> 6.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST <br /> A vapor extraction feasibility pilot test was conducted at the site on December 21, 1993 An <br /> I Environmental Techniques Vaclean 1000 vapor extraction system, consisting of a Ford <br /> Motors 300 cubic-inch internal-combustion engine and a vacuum blower, were connected <br /> to vadose-zone well VW-1 with 4-mch PVC schedule 40 pipe Two in-hne Magnehelic <br /> gauges were used to monitor the vacuum pressure in the line, and a 55-gallon drum was <br /> connected ahead of the blo*er to separate hquids Fromm Vapors 111ropane was used as a <br /> supplemental fuel source, and valves in the piping system were used to regulate the <br /> I propane, an, and well vapors to attain steady, efficient combustion of extracted <br /> hydrocarbons The system was operated for approximately S hours During that time, a <br /> Flame ionization Detector (Sensidyne model 7012111M calibrated to methane) was used <br /> Ito monitoi exti acted vapor concentrations at half-hour intervals, and three vapor samples <br /> were collected in tedlai bags Vapor samples were transmitted to WEST Laboratories for <br /> 0-1"—1 Audra S,ry Inv ^ <br /> L!/l2 714llArm TUo.M.r� G <br /> I <br />