Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> KEI-P89-1104 .QR3 <br /> October 31, 1991 <br /> Page 5 <br /> During field activities on April 23 , 1990, the old pump (5 feet <br /> long) and pump casing (60 feet long) were removed from the well. <br /> The total depth of the well was measured at 135 feet below grade <br /> with the static water level measured at 55 feet below grade. The <br /> length of the existing casing could not be determined with the <br /> equipment on-site. Approximately 135 gallons of water were bailed <br /> from the water well using a clean stainless steel bailer. A water <br /> sample was obtained for analyses, and it was noted that the water <br /> sample contained sediment and what appeared to be iron flakes. The <br /> water sample was analyzed at Sequoia Analytical Laboratory in <br /> Redwood City, California, on April 24 , 1990, for TPH as gasoline <br /> and BTX&E. The analytical results indicated non-detectable levels <br /> of TPH as gasoline and BTX&E, except for 0.79 ppb of toluene. Mr. <br /> Knoll was informed of the results on May 10, 1990, and indicated <br /> that the ground water should be treated as contaminated because of <br /> the detected toluene. <br /> West Hazmat only had 100 feet of the 12-inch O.D. augers available <br /> on-site on April 23 , 1990, and therefore the well (135 feet deep) <br /> could not be fully drilled out and the casing could not be removed <br /> from the ground. A phone call was placed from the field to Mrs. <br /> Diane Henson of the SJCPHS to determine if the work plan could be <br /> modified to allow the six-inch diameter well casing to remain in <br /> the ground and to allow grout being placed only on the inside of <br /> the casing for the full depth of the well. This modification to <br /> our work plan was verbally approved by Mrs. Henson. <br /> However, further evaluation of the surface area adjacent to the <br /> six-inch diameter well casing identified a second casing, approxi- <br /> mately 10 inches in diameter, around the six-inch diameter casing. <br /> The depth of the second casing could not be determined, and it was <br /> unclear if the annulus between the six and ten-inch diameter <br /> casings was backfilled or open. A second phone call was placed to <br /> Diane Henson on April 23, 1990, and it was determined that only <br /> grouting of the inside of the six-inch casing would not necessarily <br /> provide an adequate seal to protect the ground water. Therefore, <br /> KEI was instructed not to destroy the water well at that time. <br /> The water well was provided with a temporary surface seal on April <br /> 23 , 1990, by driving in a circular wood plug, pouring one sack of <br /> bentonite powder gel over the wood plug and vicinity, and placing <br /> cement over the bentonite gel. <br /> KEI contacted Purviance Drillers, Inc. of Linden, California, for <br /> a proposal to properly abandon the dual cased water well. It was <br /> initially proposed to jet out any materials within the annulus <br /> spacing between the two well casings, split the six-inch diameter <br /> casing with a down-the-hole perforator tool, and to place Baroid <br /> Aquagrout Benseal within the annulus and within the six-inch <br />