Laserfiche WebLink
1'W9LE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: 7 Eleven No. 17334,4501 N.Pershing Ave., Stockton,San Joaquin County(RB 11390521) <br /> :YD 1. Distance to production wells for municipal,domestic, A 1999 sensitive receptor survey reported two water supply <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of wells within 2,000'of the Site. The wells are 1,800 southeast <br /> the site. and 1,800 feet southwest,respectively. The supply wells are <br /> not threatened by the petroleum hydrocarbons release. <br /> Y 2.Site maps,to scale,of area impacted showing In 9/98, three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs were removed. <br /> locations of any former and existing tank systems, Site maps and figures showing tank locations,area of <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and excavations,buildings and residual pollutants were <br /> monitoring well elevation contours,gradients,and provided in investigation reports. <br /> nearby surface waters, buildings,streets,and <br /> subsurface utilities; <br /> 713. Figures depicting lithology(cross Site lithology consists of clay,silt,and sand to 50', the total depth investigated. <br /> section),treatments stem diagrams; All figures were provided in the investigation reports. <br /> Y 4.Stockpiled soil remaining on-site Approximately 8.3 tons of soil was excavated and transported to TPS <br /> or off-site disposal(quantity); Technologies,Inc.in Adelanto. Consultant did not estimate mass of TPH <br /> removed by excavation. <br /> Y 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, Seven(7)monitoring(MW-1 through MW-4,MW-1A,MW-5A and MW-5B)and two <br /> ate; I remediation(SPV-1 and SPV-2)wells will be properly destroyed prior to closure. <br /> 6.Tabulated results of all groundwater Tabulated data was provided in reports indicating depth to groundwater ranged <br /> elevations and depths to water; from 13'bgs to 20'bgs. Groundwater flow was towards the northeast. <br /> Groundwater gradient varied from 0.003 ft/ft to 0.004 ft(ft. <br /> 7.Tabulated results of all sampling All data was adequately tabulated in various reports. <br /> and analyses: <br /> Y❑ Detection limits for <br /> confirmation sampling <br /> ❑Y Lead analyses <br /> LyJ 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in The horizontal extent of the petroleum <br /> soil and groundwater,and both on-site and off-site: pollution extends approximately 50'offsite <br /> under N.Pershing Ave. Vertical extent was <br /> Lateral and Y❑Vertical extent of soil contamination delineated by non-detect results at MW-5B <br /> fo Lateral and FYI Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface Pilot study for SVE demonstrated a radius of <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and influence at 30'.A full scale treatment system <br /> groundwater remediation system; was not required by the regulatory agency. <br /> YJ 10.Reports/information ❑Y Unauthorized Release Form ❑Y QMRs(59)12-97to 7-13 <br /> FY Well and boring logs 151PAR FRP FY Other Site Conceptual Model, 10-13;Site Closure <br /> Re uest, 10-13 <br /> Y I 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or Leak was stopped by removing tanks. Soil vapor extraction(pilot study) <br /> an explanation for not using BAT; and natural attenuation were implemented as the BAT. <br /> Y 12. Reasons why-.background.waslis not. Contaminant-concentrations-are declining-naturally and background is <br /> mable using BAT; predicted to be restored in 10 years. <br /> Y1 13.Mass balance calculation of substance Consultant did not provide estimates of mass in soil and groundwater. <br /> treated versus that remaining; <br /> Y 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations Site is an active service station that is exempt from LTCP vapor <br /> and model used in risk assessments,and fate intrusion limits. Consultant states site does not represent a significant <br /> and transport modeling; environmental or health risk. <br /> _y] 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at Groundwater pollution is reportedly confined to within 50'of the <br /> site will not adversely impact water quality, property limits.Land use(commercial)is not expected to change in the <br /> health,or other beneficial uses;and foreseeable future. WQOs are predicted to be reached by 2024. <br /> Groundwater plume is stable and slowly decreasing in concentration. <br /> By: JLB Comments: Three 10,000-gallon gasoline UST were removed at the subject site. Soil pollution presents a <br /> minimal threat to human health and groundwater pollution is predicted to be restored in 10 years.Based on <br /> Date: the stable and declining concentrations in groundwater,no foreseeable changes in future land use <br /> 3/17/2014 (commercial),and minimal risks from soil vapor and soil,Regional Board staff concur with San Joaquin <br /> County's Closure Recommendation. <br />