Laserfiche WebLink
to g <br /> 1,192 Std(ft[nlliv1l,w <br /> Site Csxla uua <br /> City u(Stu k(v,,Fir<Statuvy Nu.h <br /> S..I,tunhtr 22.I'}y'- <br /> Pegc 2 <br /> IIlC1U(lln�' l){Ibhc and 1)rlvale thorough�itres, p <br /> rCVCllll'.Ll <br /> roceeded until site attributes. 10 exciivatloll, RFSNA PcrsonllL� Zoller tlt or story <br /> ed soil <br /> l:xcavati011 p )It. Subsewlent <br /> further clrl.<�.rgement of the 1 <br /> s from the pit walls an[t one sample from the t�uor of the pit ( Igtlt�t)le t). <br /> sample ted that petroleum hydrocarbon co stit{silloor4(�r� present in s[)ils <br /> analysis of the samples indlc.l <br /> it as well as t P <br /> still in place on the south and c.tst �L tils of th[ p <br /> . til ";as subsequently backflllcd wish clean en <br /> Due to ncercd material <br /> safety Collsi[lcratioll5, the 1 <br /> and compacted to grade <br /> . .A )ersollnel advanced lkvo soil borings (S131 and RIW 1) to respcctivc <br /> April 29, 1991, l2ESlti i mate the extent of hydrocarbonng�illl a the <br /> on <br /> �V 1 was subsequently converted ct`o, Bible toltilera e"i sof t suspected sols <br /> depths Of:Ib•5 and 38 feet below grade to further inves Iz� <br /> soils. Soil Boring M <br /> locatirn of the info borings are $down on l.igure 2. <br /> soil boring and ni'iseltaring well were located as close ' <br /> Contamination. rale in Boring <br /> de in boring SBI, did not detect the presence of diesel <br /> orator analyses of soil sampiCS�allected at 10.5 and 25.5 feet below g <br /> 1�1b Y below or <br /> and also at 20.5 and 25.5 <br /> constituents above the metllo(1 detection limit (l able 1)recorded al apprax.imately 28 Sect below <br /> mens of h'IW 1 lnd <br /> The depth to first groundsdwa beneath the site was of monitoring <br /> second sampling <br /> ,o[rndwater collected�l!subsequent <br /> sh�A development <br /> grade. Analysis of g` acted by p <br /> groundwater was not impacted <br /> 199 „�s gain free of detectable levels of hydrocarbon constituents <br /> Well MW 1, on Aug 2, <br /> r (Table 2)• lase see RESr<A's Augusl 23, 1991 <br /> For a detailed description at tllc previous work perforllled,p <br /> pr•oblerrr Asse,ss!rrerrt Report, '0"' the above referenced site. presence of <br /> P, tile <br /> in a letter dated hl plan. 10, <br /> 1992 <br /> Based upon <br /> the shallaly historical grotmdwa1e ill the vicinity of the site and the <br /> residual diesel hydrocarbarls Ill the soil, t <br /> requested <br /> further definition of the soil cantalnination and/or a remedial action o the PliSllrl-lll <br /> RESNA submitted a Soil Remediation Phil impacted soil for <br /> On behalf of the City of Stockton, roved by the PNSll II:HD on July 6, <br /> sioned <br /> excava <br /> dated June 24, 1992. The workplan was workplan <br /> orkpl ntwas app to the remainma <br /> aboveground treatment or disposal• The <br /> 1992, with no modifications. <br /> e�v n t ert.t'ulxu9t,l y 2.u x P <br />