Laserfiche WebLink
J <br /> 3.0 Site�Investigation Results <br /> 3.1 Underground Utility Survey <br /> The geophysical underground utility survey revealed possible subsurface utilities just east of the <br /> CPT locations. The CPT locations appeared to be on the eastern edge of a patched section of <br /> �= asphalt where.a UST was reportedly removed. The edge of the patched asphalt and fill material <br /> �•• below created an anomalous area that might be masking other utilities. It was therefore <br /> recommended that the CPT locations be moved 2.5 feet to the west where a GPR traverse <br /> indicated no anomalous areas. <br /> 3.2 Cone Penetrometer Testing <br /> The CPT log indicated that potential water bearing zones were located at 23.2 meters (76 feet), <br /> and 26.5 meters (87 feet). The cone penetration test data is included in Appendix A. <br /> 3.3 Soil Conditions <br /> A soil sample was collected from 7.9 meters (26 feet)BGS. Petroleum hydrocarbons, VOC's, <br /> -� and fuel oxygenate compounds were not detected in the soil sample at concentrations in excess <br /> of the analytical method reporting limits. Analytical results are presented in Table 1. <br /> ' 3.4 Groundwater Conditions <br /> Temperature, p Y H and conductivity of each groundwater sample were recorded on field report <br /> forms. These measurements are presented below. <br /> Sample ID Sample Sample Temperature pH Conductivity <br /> Depth(ft) Depth(m) (°C) (PS/cm) <br /> SC-1-76' 76 23.2 21.5 7.50 408.6 <br /> I SC-1-87' 87 26.5 19.7 7.35 439.2 <br /> F <br /># Groundwater samples were collected from each of the targeted water bearing zones. Petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons, VOC's, and fuel oxygenate compounds were not detected in the groundwater <br /> samples at concentrations in excess of the analytical method reporting limits. Analytical results <br /> are presented in Table 2. <br /> ' Aftmw TKMabo,%ISACRFPIICOMMOMsacOPL200APRJWJ8i8=527&2aa.cW 3-1 <br /> a <br /> 4W2 <br />