Laserfiche WebLink
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> ORDER NO. 98-217 <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> FOR <br /> COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 31 <br /> FLAG CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, (hereafter Board) finds that: <br /> 1. The San Joaquin County Department of Public Works (hereafter Discharger) submitted a Report of <br /> Waste Discharge, dated 7 July 1997, and additional information dated 6 May 1998, for its <br /> wastewater treatment and disposal facility. The property (Assessor's Parcel No. 055-320-09) is <br /> owned by the Discharger. <br /> 2. San Joaquin County Service Area(CSA)No. 31 is in Sections 13 and 14, T3N,RSE, MDB&M, <br /> with surface water drainage to Dredger Cut which is tributary to White Slough, as shown in <br /> Attachment A,which is attached hereto and part of the Order by reference. <br /> 3. Flag City Wastewater Treatment Plant has been operating under a National Pollutant Discharge <br /> Elimination System(NPDES)permit (Order No. 92-060, Permit No. CA0082848) adopted by the <br /> Board on 27 March 1992. This permit prescribed requirements for the treatment and surface water <br /> discharge of treated effluent from a commercial development along the junction of Interstate 5 and <br /> State Route 12. Development has been slow, however, and influent flows comprise only a fraction <br /> of the plant's design flow of 0.16 million gallons per day (mgd). The Discharger has been <br /> operating the plant as a continuous flow extended aeration activated sludge facility,which is better <br /> for handling low hydraulic and organic loading conditions. <br /> 4. Although the permit regulates a discharge to Highline Canal, since plant startup in late 1995, <br /> disposal has been to an evaporation and percolation(EP) pond. This pond was originally intended <br /> to be used as an emergency pond, but because of the extremely light hydraulic and organic loading, <br /> the plant could not reliably produce effluent to meet permit limitations for a surface water discharge. <br /> With Discharger concurrence, Board staff have recommended that waste discharge requirements be <br /> adopted in place of the NPDES permit until such time that the land discharge capability is exhausted. <br /> The Discharger will apply to the Board for another NPDES permit at least six months before the <br /> time that surface water discharge arrangements are needed. An engineered report shall be submitted <br /> six (6) months from the date of adoption of this Order that provides the basis for timing of the <br /> permit application submittal. The report shall contain a pond capacity evaluation, an analysis <br /> demonstrating that all land discharge options will be exhausted, and a proposed flow rate that will <br /> trigger submittal of the NPDES permit application. <br /> 5. The Discharger discharges an average of 0.0145 mgd of treated wastewater to the EP pond. <br />