Laserfiche WebLink
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> ORDER NO. <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> FOR <br /> COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 31 <br /> FLAG CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, (hereafter Board) R (� <br /> finds that: lul\\vl I <br /> 1. The San Joaquin County Department of Public Works (hereafter Discharger) submitted a <br /> Report of Waste Discharge, dated 7 July 1997, and additional information dated 6 May 1998, <br /> for their wastewater treatment and disposal facility. The property (Assessor's Parcel No. 055- T <br /> 320-09) is owned by the Discharger. <br /> 2. San Joaquin County Service Area(CSA)No. 31 is in Sections 13 and 14, T3N,RSE, MDB&M, <br /> with surface water drainage to Dredger Cut which is tributary to White Slough, as shown in <br /> Attachment A,which is attached hereto and part of the Order by reference. r <br /> 3. Flag City Wastewater Treatment Plant has been operating under a National Pollutant Discharge <br /> Elimination System (NPDES)permit(Order No. 92-060, Permit No. CA0082848)adopted by <br /> the Board on 27 March 1992. This permit prescribed requirements for the treatment and <br /> surface water discharge of treated effluent from a commercial development along the junction <br /> of Interstate 5 and State Route 12. Development has been slow,however, and influent flows <br /> comprise only a fraction of the plant's design flow of 0.16 million gallons per day (mgd). The <br /> Discharger has been operating the plant as a continuous flow extended aeration activated sludge <br /> facility,which is better for handling low hydraulic and organic loading conditions. <br /> 4. Although the permit regulates a discharge to Highline Canal, since plant startup in late 1995, <br /> disposal has been to an evaporation and percolation(EP) pond. This pond was originally <br /> intended to be used as an emergency pond, but because of the extremely light hydraulic and <br /> organic loading,the plant could not reliably produce effluent to meet permit limitations for a <br /> surface water discharge. With Discharger concurrence,Board staff have recommended that <br /> waste discharge requirements be adopted in place of the NPDES permit until such time that the <br /> land discharge capability is exhausted. The Discharger will apply to the Board for another <br /> NPDES permit at least six months before the time that surface water discharge arrangements <br /> are needed. An engineered report shall be submitted six (6) months from the date of adoption <br /> of this Order that provides the basis for timing of the permit application submittal. The report <br /> shall contain a pond capacity evaluation, an analysis demonstrating that all land discharge <br /> options will be exhausted, and a proposed flow rate that will trigger submittal of the NPDES <br /> permit application. <br />