Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—ENVIRONMENTAL PR(`- ^-TION AGENCY PETE WILSON,Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WAS QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— OF <br /> CENTRAL <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD,SUITE A El ,11g <br /> SACRAMENTO,CA 95827-3098 ff�r�I'�#1 <br /> PHONE: (916)255-3000 <br /> FAX: (916)255-30151!0,t� _ Ei f # ` <br /> 29 <br /> 6 November 1995 <br /> Mr Donald Moore <br /> SECOR International Inc. <br /> 90 New Montgomery Street, Suite 620 <br /> San Francisco, CA 94105 <br /> REVIEW OF QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT AND PROPOSAL <br /> FOR PASSIVE BIOREMEDIATION DEVICES,TOWER PARK MARINA, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY <br /> Thank you for submitting the third quarter monitoring report for Tower Park Marina, which you <br /> have prepared on behalf of P.S. Marina Investors I. <br /> The report states that analytical results from Monitoring Well (MW)-3 show decrease in gasoline . <br /> (TPHg) and diesel (TPHd)compared with May 1995 results. Examination of Table 3 in the report <br /> shows that both gasoline and diesel remain higher,however,than reported in January 1995. <br /> Results from the other wells are relatively consistent with historical results. The report further <br /> states that the passive skimmer in MW-3 appears to be successful in removing floating product, <br /> based on decrease in measured thickness of the product. Product now occurs as a sheen in the <br /> well. <br /> In addition the report cites information from the manufacturer of the passive skimmer that the <br /> effectiveness of the device is severely decreased when product thickness is very thin or reduced to <br /> a sheen. Based on this information and on the measured thickness records, SECOR proposed to <br /> remove the skimmer from well MW-3, and to implement a free product and removal program. <br /> SECOR proposes to measure the free product thickness every two weeks, using an interface <br /> probe, and to remove ten casing volumes of product and impacted water. The report does not <br /> explain what will be done with the removed water and product,but it does state that product <br /> removed to date by the skimmer is contained on site. We request clarification on how the product is <br /> stored, for how long, and what is ultimately done with it. <br /> Based on a 3 November telephone conversation with you, we understand that the skimmer has <br /> now been removed. <br /> In addition to bailing product and impacted water from MW-3 on an as-needed basis, you propose <br /> to install passive remediation devices, consisting of a sleeve or sock containing an oxygen <br /> releasing compound(ORC), in wells MW-2,MW-3, and MW-4. The purpose of these <br /> installations is to enhance natural bioremediation.The technique does not have a long track record, <br /> but Board staff are aware of similar approaches being used at several other out of state sites. <br /> Based on our 3 November telephone conversation with.you, we understand that the particular <br />