My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
2480
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506159
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 9:47:20 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 9:35:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0506159
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007237
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY EXPRESS WASH & LUBE
STREET_NUMBER
2480
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
21449002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2480 N TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Emergency Remediation - 2480 Tracy Blvd., Tracy, CA. • Page 18 <br /> 1 <br /> Samples were recovered from the selected sampling locations by brushing aside the <br /> surficial soil and driving a 2 in.-diameter by 4 in.-long brass sampling tube into the treated <br /> soil until the tube was completely full. <br /> (Note: Before Soil Spread I was formally sampled, a trial sample - designated TRIAL-N - <br /> was recovered from an arbitrary location in the portion of the spread lying to the north of <br /> the basement excavation. Test results from that sample, which showed that it contained no <br /> detectable concentrations of the analytes of concern, were used to help evaluate the <br /> optimal methods and duration of aeration that would be required to meet the goals of.the <br /> ' emergency remediation plan.) <br /> Following sample recovery, the sample tubes were cleaned externally, the ends covered <br /> with aluminum foil and closed with tightly-fitting plastic caps secured by adhesiveless tape. <br /> Each sample tube was then labeled for identification, entered into chain-of-custody <br /> control, packed on chemical ice, and placed in an electric sample cooler for transport to <br /> I Chromalab Inc.'s laboratory in Pleasanton, California where they were analyzed for the <br /> following suite of analytes. <br /> Analyte Method of Analysis <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPA Method 5030/8015 <br /> (as Gasoline) <br /> Benzene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Toluene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Ethyl Benzene EPA Method 8020 <br /> Total Xylenes Isomers EPA Method 8020 <br /> The results of the analyses performed on sample TRIAL-N and on the soil samples <br /> recovered from each of the five spreads of treated soil are presented in Table 3. <br /> Analytical results from the samples from Soil Spreads 1, 3, 4, and 5, with one <br /> inconsequential exception (Sample A5 from Soil Spread No. 6) show that none of soil in <br /> those spread contained any detectable concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> (quantified as gasoline) although very minor traces of some BTEX compounds (none <br /> exceeding 0.031 ppm)were detected in a small number of the samples. <br /> Both of the samples recovered from Soil Spread No. 2 contained barely detectable <br /> concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (1.7 ppm or less) and proportionate trace <br /> concentrations of the BTEX compounds (except for toluene, which was absent from both <br /> samples). Soil Spread No. 2 was the smallest of the seven spreads used to treat the <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.