My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
14749
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507155
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 9:56:29 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 9:44:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0507155
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007718
FACILITY_NAME
3 B'S TRUCK PLAZA
STREET_NUMBER
14749
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05515026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14749 N THORNTON RD
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
USTCF Budget Allocations -2- <br /> All active Priority Class A, B and C claims that are expected to incur costs during FY <br /> 11/12 were allocated a budget, with the exceptions noted above. Unfortunately, due to <br /> the limited amount of funding available for claim budgets, some significant individual <br /> claim costs, such as system start-up costs for Priority B and C claims, were not able to <br /> be accommodated in the budget allocation process. Those claims were allocated a <br /> minimal annual budget amount of$10,000. This minimal annual budget amount should <br /> be sufficient for limited-scope, semi-annual groundwater monitoring events or other <br /> minimal site work as necessary. This allocation is intended to allow the claimant to <br /> conduct a minimal amount of work to document current site conditions until the next <br /> budget cycle. <br /> The claim budgets are based on our revenue forecasts under current conditions. The <br /> Fund understands that legislation has been introduced to extend the Chapter 649, <br /> Statutes of 2009 (AB 1188) $0.006 increase to the Fund fee for another two years. If, <br /> and when, this proposed fee extension is passed, the Fund will revisit the claim budgets <br /> and adjust them accordingly. Similarly, the Fund will monitor expenditures against the <br /> amount of money set aside for contingencies throughout the upcoming year. If this <br /> contingency funding is not being used, we anticipate being able to distribute the money <br /> to claims budgets incrementally through the course of the year. <br /> These claim budgets are being used as administrative tools to help the Fund manage <br /> both our short-term claim-specific cash flow, as well as our overall program cash flow. <br /> They are not meant to limit regulatory directives, and should not be used as justification <br /> that regulatory directives on a site cannot be complied with. Claimants must continue to <br /> comply with existing regulatory directives, regardless of whether the Fund can <br /> reimburse those costs or not. The Fund recommends that claimants and regulators <br /> discuss strategies to continue corrective action work, perhaps at a smaller-scale or in a <br /> phased approach, for those sites with reduced available budgets from the Fund. <br /> Implementation of successful cost-saving strategies such as remedial process <br /> optimization and long-term monitoring optimization is also strongly encouraged by the <br /> Fund. <br /> Future Years <br /> The Fund anticipates that, under current conditions, the amount of funding available for <br /> claim budgets will stabilize in future fiscal years as costs from previous fiscal years are <br /> paid off. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Ca ,4ectcleecaper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.