Laserfiche WebLink
USTCF Budget Allocations -2- <br /> All active Priority Class A, B and C claims that are expected to incur costs during FY <br /> 11/12 were allocated a budget, with the exceptions noted above. Unfortunately, due to <br /> the limited amount of funding available for claim budgets, some significant individual <br /> claim costs, such as system start-up costs for Priority B and C claims, were not able to <br /> be accommodated in the budget allocation process. Those claims were allocated a <br /> minimal annual budget amount of$10,000. This minimal annual budget amount should <br /> be sufficient for limited-scope, semi-annual groundwater monitoring events or other <br /> minimal site work as necessary. This allocation is intended to allow the claimant to <br /> conduct a minimal amount of work to document current site conditions until the next <br /> budget cycle. <br /> The claim budgets are based on our revenue forecasts under current conditions. The <br /> Fund understands that legislation has been introduced to extend the Chapter 649, <br /> Statutes of 2009 (AB 1188) $0.006 increase to the Fund fee for another two years. If, <br /> and when, this proposed fee extension is passed, the Fund will revisit the claim budgets <br /> and adjust them accordingly. Similarly, the Fund will monitor expenditures against the <br /> amount of money set aside for contingencies throughout the upcoming year. If this <br /> contingency funding is not being used, we anticipate being able to distribute the money <br /> to claims budgets incrementally through the course of the year. <br /> These claim budgets are being used as administrative tools to help the Fund manage <br /> both our short-term claim-specific cash flow, as well as our overall program cash flow. <br /> They are not meant to limit regulatory directives, and should not be used as justification <br /> that regulatory directives on a site cannot be complied with. Claimants must continue to <br /> comply with existing regulatory directives, regardless of whether the Fund can <br /> reimburse those costs or not. The Fund recommends that claimants and regulators <br /> discuss strategies to continue corrective action work, perhaps at a smaller-scale or in a <br /> phased approach, for those sites with reduced available budgets from the Fund. <br /> Implementation of successful cost-saving strategies such as remedial process <br /> optimization and long-term monitoring optimization is also strongly encouraged by the <br /> Fund. <br /> Future Years <br /> The Fund anticipates that, under current conditions, the amount of funding available for <br /> claim budgets will stabilize in future fiscal years as costs from previous fiscal years are <br /> paid off. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Ca ,4ectcleecaper <br />