My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
14749
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507155
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2020 9:56:29 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 9:44:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0507155
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007718
FACILITY_NAME
3 B'S TRUCK PLAZA
STREET_NUMBER
14749
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95242
APN
05515026
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14749 N THORNTON RD
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:01 AM <br /> To: 'tcuellar@advgeoenv.com' <br /> Subject: FW: 3Bs EPA Method 524 <br /> here's Margarets/EHD response. . <br /> get the 524 ! <br /> -----original Message----- <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:59 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 3Bs EPA Method 524 <br /> I don't think we need 24 hour turn around. Since we accept that public water systems are <br /> meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act requirements based on drinking water methods, I think <br /> the analysis should be by the 524 Method. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:55 AM <br /> To: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Subject: 3Bs EPA Method 524 <br /> seems the 524 Method may NOT be helpful. what do you think. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Timothy Cuellar [mailto:tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:41 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: EPA Method 524 <br /> Mike - just called McCampbell Analytical and talked to chemist; she told me <br /> there will be no difference between their 8260 method and their 524 method <br /> because they have already dropped the detection limit to 0.5 ug/1 for the <br /> 8260 analysis. . . . . . . .do you still want AGE to collect a confirmation sample <br /> by EPA Method 524. Even if I run a 24-hour turnaround, we would be hard <br /> pressed to get results by the end of tomorrow since they will not receive <br /> samples until LOAM on Thursday. - Tim <br /> Timothy Joseph Cuellar <br /> Project Geologist <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> (209) 467-1006 <br /> tcuellar@advgeoenv.com <br /> This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and <br /> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized <br /> review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If <br /> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email/fax <br /> and destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.