Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />' 1.0. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I <br />' 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION 1 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING 2 <br />' 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES 2 <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br />' <br /> 31 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT 3 <br /> 32 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES 3 <br />' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 <br />' 6.0. LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 <br />' FIGURES <br />� . FIGURE 1 -Location Map <br /> FIGURE 2 - Site Map <br /> FIGURE 3 - Ground Water Elevation Map 04 December 2002 <br /> IFIGURE 4 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved TPH-g December 2002 <br /> FIGURE 5 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved TPH d December 2002 <br />' FIGURE 6 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved MTBE December 2002 <br /> ITABLES <br /> TABLE 1 - Summary of Monitoring Well Details <br /> TABLE 2 - Ground Water Elevation Data <br /> TABLE 3 -Analytical Results of Ground Water Samples - Site Investigation <br /> TABLE 4 -Analytical Results of Ground Water Samples - 06 December 2002 <br /> APPENDICES <br /> IAPPENDIX A - Flag City Chevron Monitoring Data <br /> APPENDIX B - Ground Water Monitoring Field Logs <br /> IAPPENDIX C -Laboratory Reports of Analytical Results <br /> • <br /> I <br />