Laserfiche WebLink
January 12 , 1990 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (d) No comment. <br /> (e) The lot line adjustment has been submitted to the <br /> Surveyor ' s office. Processing could take one <br /> month. <br /> (1) The new legal description which was a condi- <br /> tion of the adjustment has been submitted to <br /> Planning. <br /> Question: Must the adjustment be recorded prior <br /> to final site approval? <br /> (f) No comment. <br /> (g) and (h) A form of access easement has been <br /> prepared and submitted to Planning. <br /> Question: Since the easements are shown in the <br /> improvement plan, do the documents have to be exe- <br /> cuted prior to site approval? <br /> (1) We have been told that the corrected small lot <br /> location now has the edge of the lot in the <br /> middle of the drainage canal and a drainage <br /> easement is not necessary. <br /> Question: Is this correct? <br /> 2 . PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES <br /> (a) The wash rack sand/oil separator. <br /> Question: Will approval of the systems and <br /> issuance of a facility permit/waste discharge suf- <br /> fice , or does this separator have to be installed <br /> prior to final site approval? <br /> (b) Dedication of the leachfield has been shown on the <br /> final improvement plan. <br /> (c) No comment. <br /> Since a new septic tank must be installed on the new <br /> lot, we assume a permit will be needed. Does application for <br /> this have to wait for final site approval? Our client is <br /> obviously at this date anxious to expedite the matter. <br />