My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013248
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
17749
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-90-1
>
SU0013248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:21 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:56:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013248
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
QX-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
17749
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
Zip
95227-
APN
01922024
ENTERED_DATE
5/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17749 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reducing the capacity of the river to transport sediment close to the quarry site. Because <br /> the potential for the project to impact channel alignment is small, this potential impact <br /> is considered less than significant. <br /> Bridee Relocation <br /> The approximate site for bridge relocation has a south bank levee elevation of 83 <br /> feet and a north bank levee elevation of 78.8 feet. The water surface elevation at this <br /> location with 5,000 cfs discharge would be 75.8 feet based on predicted river stages <br /> (USGS, 1972). At an 18,000 cfs discharge (discharge for the 100 year flood), the river <br /> would reach an elevation of approximately 85 feet. Therefore, the bridge, if constructed <br /> at the top elevation of the south side levee, would be inundated by 2 feet of water with <br /> the 100 year flood. <br /> The analyses of flood stage by USGS was based upon conditions surveyed in <br /> 1970 and makes the following assumptions: (1) no levee failures; (2) no additional <br /> encroachment in channel by land reclamation and levee construction; (3) no additional <br /> encroachment by trees and brush; and, (4) no change in streambed elevations. If any of <br /> these assumptions are no longer valid, then inundation of the bridge and surrounding <br /> farmlands could occur with a smaller discharge than those indicated in the USGS report. <br /> If the bridge span requires construction of structural supports in the channel or <br /> fill and pilings on the levee, then the channel capacity could be reduced. Any <br /> constriction of the channel would decrease flood carrying capacity, resulting in a higher <br /> river stage for a given discharge. Flow velocities would also become greater, increasing <br /> the probability of scour on the channel bottom and erosion along the levee banks. A <br /> reduction in channel capacity would increase the chance that levees would be breached <br /> during flood flows, inundating land adjacent to the channel and possibly damaging the <br /> levees. <br /> If the levee were to fail, the extent of flooding would cover an area larger than <br /> the floodzones delineated in the FIRM. The quarry site could become inundated during <br /> flood flows and any exposed topsoil stockpiled could be entrained, increasing siltation to <br /> the Mokelumne River. Increased sedimentation may also occur due to the demolition of <br /> the old bridge site and construction at the relocation site. Sediments deposited <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.