My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013248
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
17749
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-90-1
>
SU0013248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:21 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:56:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013248
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
QX-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
17749
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
Zip
95227-
APN
01922024
ENTERED_DATE
5/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17749 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are currently no sites for water storage if pumping is required to remove <br /> water from the quarry area, except for the county-owned drainage pond. Water within <br /> the quarry pits would likely to be turbid, and would introduce sediment if pumped to <br /> the Mokelumne River. Groundwater pumping may draw down local water tables, <br /> potentially affecting the performance of nearby shallow wells. <br /> If water were allowed to stand in the quarry pits, the saturated substratum could <br /> present a safety problem for operation of heavy equipment at the site. Saturation would <br /> decrease the cohesiveness of the substratum, increasing the possibility of wall collapse <br /> within the quarry pits. These impacts are considered potentially significant. <br /> Groundwater extraction for project operation could locally impact the groundwater table <br /> and affect nearby wells. No definitive information is available to determine the <br /> potential for this impact; however, the existing project has utilized groundwater from <br /> this well for at least 8 years at an average rate of about 10,000 gallons per day, and no <br /> adverse impact on local wells has been identified. <br /> 3.2.3 Mitigation Measures <br /> The mitigation measures listed below are intended to reduce the potentially <br /> significant impacts that would result from project construction to less than significant <br /> levels. <br /> 1. The potential for change in channel alignment, although insignificant, should be <br /> reduced in case of a levee failure during peak streamflow events. The gravel <br /> extraction pits shall be left open for as brief a time as possible, particularly <br /> during the rainfall season, and the pits shall be aligned perpendicular to the <br /> streamf low. <br /> 2. The new bridge site shall be constructed so as to minimize constriction of the <br /> channel and prevent a decrease in flood carrying capacity of the Mokelumne <br /> River that may increase erosion and flood potential. The San Joaquin County <br /> Public Works Department and the State Reclamation Board should require the <br /> cross sectional area of the channel at the new bridge site to be surveyed to <br /> determine that the present channel capacity has not changed since the USGS <br /> report. A permit from the State Reclamation Board will be required for <br /> relocation of the bridge. The bridge relocation must also comply with <br /> requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the San Joaquin <br /> County Flood Prevention Ordinance. <br /> 3. An erosion control plan shall be prepared and implemented according to <br /> guidelines developed and approved by the San Joaquin County Department of <br /> Public Works and the State Reclamation Board. Bridge removal and relocation <br /> 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.